以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 54-58.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.05.054

• 临床护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

生物养育法联合317护APP对产妇母乳喂养的影响

沈敏, 郑雅宁, 张竑, 吴瑜玲   

  1. 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院 妇产科,江苏 南京 210008
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-25 发布日期:2020-07-14
  • 通讯作者: 吴瑜玲(1963-),女,江苏南京人,本科学历,主任护师。
  • 作者简介:沈 敏(1978-),女,江苏南京人,本科学历,主管护师。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生和计划生育委员会项目(F201657)

Effect of Biological Nurturing and APP of Nursing 317 on Breastfeeding

SHEN Min, ZHENG Ya-ning, ZHANG Hong, YU Yu-ling   

  1. Dept. of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2018-12-25 Published:2020-07-14

摘要: 目的 探讨生物养育法联合317护APP对产妇母乳喂养的影响。方法 选取2017年1—6月我院产科病房住院的117名产妇,应用生物养育法联合317护APP对产妇进行母乳喂养健康教育,评估首次母乳喂养成功率、分娩后24 h内新生儿有效吸吮次数、产后3 d乳汁淤积引起乳房硬度情况、产后6周产妇对护理服务满意度及产后0~6个月纯母乳喂养情况。结果 首次母乳喂养得分≥8分有106名,即首次母乳喂养成功人数占90.6%。分娩后24 h内新生儿有效吸吮次数6~12次有104名(占88.9%);产后3 d发生乳汁淤积致乳房硬度为I度的产妇有95 名(占81.2%)。产后6周对护理服务满意度(97.4%)优于医院满意度达标率(90%)。本组产妇产后1周、6周、4个月及6个月纯母乳喂养率分别为88.9%、81.2%、72.6%、59.8%。结论 生物养育法联合317护APP可提高产妇首次母乳喂养成功率,改善产后24 h新生儿有效吸吮,减轻产后乳汁淤积发生,提高了母婴护理服务满意度,有效地促成纯母乳喂养行为。

关键词: 生物养育法, 317护APP, 母乳喂养

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of biological nurturing and the APP of Nursing 317 on breastfeeding. Methods Totally 117 puerperae in Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January to June 2017 received health education through biological nurturing and the APP of Nursing 317. The first success rate of breastfeeding, times of effective sucking, breast hardness induced by galactostasis 3d after the delivery, puerpera satisfaction with nursing service within 6 weeks after the delivery and exclusive breastfeeding within 6 months after the delivery were observed. Results The first success rate of breastfeeding was 90.6% and times of effective sucking ranged from 6 to 12 in 104 newborns, accounting for 88.9%. Ninety-five puerperae (81.2%) had breast hardness to I induced by galactostasis 3d after the delivery and the nursing satisfaction rate was 97.4%, higher than that of hospital satisfaction (90%). Exclusive breastfeeding rate 1 week, 6 weeks, 4 and 6 months after the delivery was 88.9%, 81.2%, 72.6% and 59.8% respectively. Conclusion Biological nurturing and the APP of Nursing 317 is effective for improving the first success rate of breastfeeding and effective sucking 24h after the delivery and reducing breast hardness induced by galactostasis, which enhance patient satisfaction with nursing service and exclusive breastfeeding.

Key words: biological nurturing, APP of nursing 317, breastfeeding

中图分类号: 

  • R473.71
[1] 于海静,刘兵,罗阳. 国内外母乳喂养相关量表及应用现状[J].护理学报,2012,19(8B):4-8.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2012.16.002.
[2] 方红英,王芝芳.6个月内婴儿纯母乳喂养现状调查分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2014,29(14):2230-2232.DOI:10.7620/j.issn1001-4411.2014.14.38.
[3] 王雪璐,庄嶶,赵敏慧,等.初产妇母乳喂养认知行为干预的效果观察[J].护理学报, 2017, 24(14):64-67.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.04.064.
[4] 中国营养学会膳食指南修订专家委员会妇幼人群指南修订专家工作组.6月龄内婴儿母乳喂养指南的科学依据[J]. 临床儿科杂志,2016, 34(8):637-640.DOI:10.3969/j.issn1000-3606.2016.08.018.
[5] Colson S.The Laid-back Breastfeeding Revolution[J].Midwifery Today Int Midwife, 2012(101):9-11.
[6] Matthews M K.Assessments and Suggested Interventions to Assist Newborn Breastfeeding Behavior[J].J Hum Lact,1993,9(4):243-248.DOI:10.1177/089033449300900425.
[7] Ellis M, Manandhar N, ShakyaU, et al. Postnata Hypothemia and Cold Stress among Newborn Infants in Nepamonitored by Continuous Ambuatory Recorging[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,1996,75(1):42-45.
[8] 郭晓琴. 运用OPT模型与NNN链接进行母乳喂养临床路径的研制[J].护理研究, 2015,29(5C):1852-1854.DOI:10.3969/j.issn1009-6493.2015.015.018.
[9] 黄曹君,韩微,樊雅静,等.不同护理干预措施减轻产妇产后乳房肿胀的效果观察[J].解放军护理杂志,2015,32(22):24-27.DOI:10.3969/j.issn1008-9993.2015.22.007.
[10] 王惠珊,曹彬.母乳喂养培训教材[M].北京:北京大学医学院出版社,2014:1-2.
[11] 戴红霞,李小毛.系统化护理干预对产妇产后不同时期哺乳技能与纯母乳喂养的影响[J].护理研究,2014,28(6A):1932-1936.DOI:10.3969/j.issn1009-6493.2014.16.006.
[12] 孙赵娜,李云云,吴兰君,等.亲情化干预对产妇自我保健能力及新生儿照护技能的影响[J].护理学报,2017,24(3):65-67.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.03.065.
[13] 张娇娇,张宏玉. 回归生物本能半躺式养育母乳喂养方式[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2017,2(23):195-196.
[14] Colson S. Maternal Breastfeeding Positions,Have We Got It Right ?[J].Pract Midwife,2005,8(10):24, 26-27.
[15] Kennell J H, McGrath S K. Beneficial Effects of Postnatal Skin-to-skin Contact[J]. Acta Paediatr,2003,92(3):272-273.
[16] Phillips R.The Sacred Hour :Un Interrupted Skin-to-skin Contact Immediately after Birth[J]. Newborn Infant Nusi Rev,2013,13(2):67-72.
[17] 黄蓉,侯燕文,刘宏,等.早期母婴皮肤接触1小时对初产妇产后6个月母乳喂养的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2015,50(12):1420-1424.DOI:10.3761/j.issn0254-1769.2015.12.02.
[18] 郭梅,吴彤彤,万慧,等.情景式健康教育在初产妇母乳喂养培训中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2012,27(18):81-82.DOI:10.3870/hlxzz.201.18.081.
[19] 李淑玲,廖惠璇,钟玲,等延续性护理对产妇产后6个月内纯母乳喂养的影响[J].现代临床护理,2015,14(4):21-25.
[20] 林琳,王培红,李荣.个性化持续性健康教育对母乳喂养依从性的影响[J].护理学杂志,2014,29(12):67-68.DOI:10.3870/hlxzz.2014.12.067.
[1] 杨丽娜, 黄蓉, 姚梅琦, 王竹青, 徐怡婷, 谢佩敏. 产后母乳喂养行为中断风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 59-65.
[2] 陈燕, 钱莉, 徐瑾. 父亲模仿婴儿吸吮乳头手法干预对母婴分离初产妇母乳喂养的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 74-78.
[3] 孙菲, 刘敏, 胡珊珊, 吴蕾, 刘君, 李萍. 基于Meta分析构建早产儿母亲泌乳建立风险预测评分模型[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 1-5.
[4] 林润, 陈晓欢, 李文洲, 金调芬, 林常芳, 朱玲玲. 母乳喂养专科护士核心能力评价指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(20): 65-69.
[5] 吴祝凤, 殷彩欣, 徐琼, 崔诗敏, 徐茜雯. 母婴皮肤接触方法及实施现状[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(1): 36-39.
[6] 赵彩霞,陆金美,朱春云,崔娟. 无缝隙护理干预对乳头凹陷初产妇母乳喂养的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(9): 53-56.
[7] 郑雅宁,丁颖,吴瑜玲. 基于自我效能的集中群组保健模式对产妇母乳喂养的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(5): 75-78.
[8] 邹丽, 郑雅宁, 吴瑜玲. 剖宫产术后医用皮肤接触组合母子衣的研制[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(22): 77-78.
[9] 孙黎,余欣,陈嘉玉,周艳,郭晓萍,王晓杰,李明龙. 基于HIMSS 7级的母乳喂养闭环管理系统的设计与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(17): 45-49.
[10] 王雪璐,庄薇,赵敏慧,余慧,侯燕文,吴文燕. 初产妇母乳喂养认知行为干预的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(4): 64-67.
[11] 王瑜,付星,靳芹,周芮. 重庆市1544名本科生母乳喂养知识、态度、意愿的现状调查[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(23): 45-48.
[12] 王金雅,方杏香,丁梦贞,柳文霞,沈军英,陈玉飞,王素萍. 400名舟山某三级甲等医院新生儿重症监护室患儿家长母乳喂养知信行调查[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(16): 34-37.
[13] 贺芳,王晓杰,温秀兰. 以家庭为中心护理对NICU患儿母乳喂养的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(16): 46-48.
[14] 郑锦霞,王勤,赵敏慧,庄薇. 闭环式管理模式对提高住院早产儿母乳喂养率效果研究[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(5): 32-34.
[15] 周明芳,洪燕,蒋艳. 基于成人学习理论护理干预对初产妇母乳喂养的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(5): 75-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!