护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 43-48.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.09.043
社区老年人对照护机器人感知与期望的Meta整合
周祎敏, 姚宇哲, 叶旭春
- 中国人民解放军海军军医大学 护理系,上海 200433
摘要： 目的 系统评价居家养老的社区老年人对于照护机器人感知与期望的质性研究。方法 计算机检索Cochrane Library、Web of Science、PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL、中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）、中国知网（CNKI）、维普数据库（VIP）和万方数据库（Wanfang Data）中社区老年人对照护机器人感知与期望相关的质性研究,检索时间均为建库至2023年3月,文献质量评价后采取汇集性整合法进行Meta整合。结果 共纳入10项研究,归纳形成11个新类别,得出3个整合结果,分别是老年人对居家使用照护机器人的多重角色感知、老年人对照护机器人尚存诸多顾虑和老年人期待未来居家照护机器人更具人性化和拟人化特征期望。结论 老年人对机器人存在多重感知角色和担忧,照护机器人设计中应当注重人性化设计和拟人化特征,并提供系统化的社会支持。
中图分类号:
- R473.2
| [1] 国家统计局国务院第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室. 第七次全国人口普查公报[ 1 ](第五号)[N].中国信息报,2021-05-12(002).[2023-05-04].DOI:10.38309/n.cnki.nzgxx.2021.000487. [2] Cho MS, Kwon MY.Factors associated with aging in place among community-dwelling older adults in Korea: findings from a national survey[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2023,20(3):2740.DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032740. [3] Palmqvist L.Cripping time in eldercare: waiting for the home care service[J]. European Journal of Social Work, 2022, 25(6):957-968.DOI:10.1080/13691457.2022.2063803. [4] Jinyan L.Research on the social security and elderly care system under the background of big data[J]. Mob Inf Syst, 2023,19(4): 9508018.DOI: 10.1155/2023/9508018. [5] Robinson H, Macdonald B, Kerse N, et al.The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2013, 14(9):661-667. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007. [6] Shuo L,Kirsty M,Phil B, et al.Exploring the role of human-following robots in supporting the mobility and wellbeing of older people[J]. Scientific Reports,2023,13(1):6512.DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33837-1. [7] Ma B, Yang J, Wong FKY, et al.Artificial intelligence in elderly healthcare:a scoping review[J].Ageing Res Rev, 2023, 83(364-371):101808.DOI:10.1016/j.arr.2022.101808. [8] 工业和信息化部,民政部,卫生健康委. 工业和信息化部民政部国家卫生健康委关于印发《智慧健康养老产业发展行动计划(2021-2025年)》的通知:工信部联电子〔2021〕154号[EB/OL]. (2021-10-20)[2023-05-04]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-10/23/content_5644434.html. [9] 孙琳. “十四五”:我国机器人产业如何扬帆起航?[N]. 人民政协报,2022-01-28(005).[2023-05-04].DOI:10.28660/n.cnki.nrmzx.2022.000625. [10] Lukasik S, Tobis S, Suwalska J, et al.The role of socially assistive robots in the care of older people: To assist in cognitive training, to remind or to accompany?[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(18):10394. DOI:10.3390/su131810394. [11] Andtfolk M, Nyholm L, Eide H, et al.Attitudes toward the use of humanoid robots in healthcare-a cross-sectional study[J]. AI & Soc, 2022, 37(4):1739-1748.DOI:10.1007/s00146-021-01271-4. [12] Betlej A.Designing robots for elderly from the perspective of potential end-users: a sociological approach[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022,19(6):3630.DOI:10.3390/ijerph19063630. [13] 周玉兰,舒晓,杨子敬,等.老年患者人工智能机器人使用意愿现状及影响因素探究[J].华西医学,2022,37(9):1340-1346. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.19.006. [14] Liu SX, Shen Q, Hancock J.Can a social robot be too warm or too competent? Older Chinese adults' perceptions of social robots and vulnerabilities[J]. Comput Hum Behav, 2021, 125(11):106942.DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106942. [15] Vandemeulebroucke T, Dzi K, Gastmans C.Older adults' experiences with and perceptions of the use of socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of quantitative evidence[J].Arch Gerontol Geriatr,2021,95(2):104399. DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2021.104399. [16] 胡雁. 循证护理学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017. [17] Lehoux P, Grimard D.When robots care: Public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2018, 211(15): 330-337. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.038 [18] Bradwell HL, Edwards KJ, Winnington R, et al.Companion robots for older people: importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(9):e032468. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-03246. [19] Chu L, Chen HW, Cheng PY, et al.Identifying features that enhance older adults' acceptance of robots: a mixed methods Study[J]. Gerontology, 2019, 65(4):441-450. DOI: 10.1159/000494881. [20] Daniele K, Marcucci M, Cattaneo C, et al.How prefrail older people living alone perceive information and communications technology and what they would ask a robot for: qualitative study[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2019, 21(8): e13228. DOI: 10.2196/13228. [21] Deutsch I, Erel H, Paz M, et al.Home robotic devices for older adults: opportunities and concerns[J]. Comput Hum Behav, 2019, 98(9): 122-133. DOI.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.002. [22] Park YH, Chang HK, Lee MH, et al.Community-dwelling older adults' needs and acceptance regarding the use of robot technology to assist with daily living performance[J]. BMC geriatrics, 2019,19(1):208.DOI:10.1186/s12877-019-1227-7. [23] Hudson J, Ungar R, Albright L, et al.Robotic pet use among community-dwelling older adults[J]. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2020, 75(9): 2018-28. [24] Gasteiger N,Ahn HS,Fok C,et al.Older adults' experiences and perceptions of living with bomy, an assistive dailycare robot: a qualitative study[J]. Assist Technol, 2021, 34(4):487-497.DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1877210. [25] 何秋,何瑛,李贵妃,等.社区老年人对陪护机器人使用意愿的质性研究[J].护理学报, 2022, 29(19):6-10.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.19.006. [26] Van Assche M, Moreels T, Petrovic M, et al.The role of a socially assistive robot in enabling older adults with mild cognitive impairment to cope with the measures of the COVID-19 lockdown: a qualitative study[J]. Scand J Occup Ther,2023,30(1):42-52.DOI:10.1080/11038128.2021.2009560. [27] Gasteiger N,Ahn H S,Fok C,et al.Older adults' experiences and perceptions of living with Bomy, an assistive dailycare robot: a qualitative study[J]. Assist Technol, 2022, 34(4): 487-497.DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1877210. [28] Hudson J, Ungar R, Albright L, et al.Robotic pet use among community-dwelling older adults[J]. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2020, 75(9):2018-2028. DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbaa119. [29] Johansson-Pajala RM, Gustafsson C.Significant challenges when introducing care robots in Swedish elder care[J]. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 2022, 17(2):166-176. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1773549. [30] Malin A, Linda N, Hilde E, et al.Humanoid robots in the care of older persons: a scoping review[J]. Assist Technol, 2021, 34(5):518-526.DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2021. [31] Sandra B, Patrizia M, Luc DW.What are the preferred characteristics of a service robot for the elderly? A multi-country focus group study with older adults and caregivers[J]. Assist Technol, 2019;31(3):147-157. DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1402390. [32] Gasteiger N, Ahn HS, Fok C, et al.Older adults' experiences and perceptions of living with Bomy, an assistive dailycare robot: a qualitative study[J]. Assist Technol, 2021,34(4):487-497.DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1877210. [33] Fang EF, Xie C, Schenkel J A, et al.A research agenda for ageing in China in the 21st century (2nd edition): Focusing on basic and translational research, long-term care, policy and social networks[J]. Ageing Res Rev, 2020, 64(8): 101174. DOI:10.1016/j.arr.2020.101174. [34] Coghlan S.Robots and the possibility of humanistic care[J]. Int J Soc Robot,2022,14(10):2095-2108.DOI:10.1007/s12369-021-00804-7. [35] Smarr CA, Mitzner TL, Beer JM, et al.Domestic robots for older adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential[J]. Int J Soc Robot, 2014, 6(2):229-247.DOI:10.1007/s12369-013-0220-0. [36] Hong JH, Lachman ME, Charles ST, et al.The positive influence of sense of control on physical, behavioral, and psychosocial health in older adults: an outcome-wide approach[J]. Prev Med, 2021, 149(1):106612. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106612. [37] Stein JP, Liebold B, Ohler P.Stay back, Clever thing! Linking situational control and human uniqueness concerns to the aversion against autonomous technology[J]. Comput Hum Behav, 2019, 95(1):73-82. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.021. [38] 陈昫. 责任伦理视角下数字时代机器人养老服务治理[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 75(4):173-184. DOI:10.14086/j.cnki.wujss.2022.04.016. [39] 刘辰. 国务院印发《新一代人工智能发展规划》:构筑我国人工智能发展先发优势[J].中国科技产业,2017(8):78-79.DOI:10.16277/j.cnki.cn11-2502/n.2017.08.033. |
| [1] | 吴超瑜, 刘尚昆. 麻醉恢复室护士危机管理能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 17-21. |
| [2] | 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42. |
| [3] | 谭雯渲, 张容, 张立力, 王玮, 邵艳红, 方庆虹, 朱瑾. 心脏移植患者手术决策困境的现象学研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 69-73. |
| [4] | 曹敏, 张培莉, 侯晓雅, 高超越, 郭林芳, 李滢. ABC-X模型下结直肠癌化疗患者照顾者营养照护体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 13-18. |
| [5] | 陈玉英, 王海彦, 陈思颖, 杨雪娟. 老年人自立支援照护模式的照护技巧及启示[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 31-36. |
| [6] | 孙娟, 李亚莉, 马安娜, 王华, 张会敏. 护理研究生对社区护理实践思政教学体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 19-23. |
| [7] | 谭丘羽, 邓一芯, 冀婉倩, 王冬华. 农村老年人自我刻板化与主观记忆抱怨在自我感知老化与痴呆恐惧间的链式中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 56-61. |
| [8] | 王语, 赵慧杰, 肖梦伟, 范硕宁, 孙佳丽, 王珂心, 苏炫, 杨滢瑞. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者硅油填充期间疾病体验与应对的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 68-72. |
| [9] | 冯春玲, 胡夏晴, 徐琳, 蔡鑫健, 徐琴鸿. 基于社会生态系统理论的电话指导公众实施心肺复苏行为动机及需求的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 66-71. |
| [10] | 曹依丽, 王玲, 王灿, 陈燕华, 秦虹云. 精神分裂症住院患者家属资源取向的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 74-78. |
| [11] | 马瑞瑞, 范晓莉, 徐姝娟, 张伟, 陈婷, 谈飞飞. 护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 6-11. |
| [12] | 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16. |
| [13] | 龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27-31. |
| [14] | 张颖, 车晓艳, 万婠, 秦雪, 张恩思, 崇武, 郑淑娟. 我国性治疗护士工作范畴和核心能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 68-72. |
| [15] | 张露心, 焦延超, 文稀, 田利, 王婷, 田凤美, 李惠玲. 护理本科生在“慕课西行”同步课堂学习体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 30-34. |
|
||