以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (13): 1-5.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.13.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

失能老人和配偶照顾者健康素养与自我效能对生活质量的交互作用

张咪1,2, 吴艳妮1, 黄秀娥3, 杨晶3, 王润1, 杨玲莉1, 赵慧慧1, 周春兰1   

  1. 1.南方医科大学南方医院,广东 广州 510515;
    2.南方医科大学 护理学院,广东 广州 510515;
    3.深圳市龙岗区人民医院,广东 深圳 518100
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-27 出版日期:2023-07-10 发布日期:2023-08-04
  • 通讯作者: 周春兰（1962-）,女,湖南益阳人,硕士,教授,主任护师,博士生导师。E-mail:lanchun200488@126.com
  • 作者简介:张咪（1994-）,女,四川巴中人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目（72074106）

Interaction of health literacy and self-efficacy on quality of life in disabled elders and spouse caregivers

ZHANG Mi1,2, WU Yan-ni1, HUANG Xiu-e3, YANG Jing3, WANG Run1, YANG Ling-li1, ZHAO Hui-hui1, ZHOU Chun-lan1   

  1. 1. Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    3. Longgang People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518100, China
  • Received:2023-03-27 Online:2023-07-10 Published:2023-08-04

PDF (PC)

244

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨失能老人和配偶照顾者的健康素养、自我效能与生活质量的关系。方法 采用便利抽样法,于2020年12月—2022年6月对我国7个省(自治区)的1086对失能老人与配偶照顾者进行问卷调查,调查工具包括日常生活功能指数量表、慢性病病人健康素养量表、一般自我效能感量表、中文版生活质量量表,通过主客体互倚模型分析失能老人和配偶照顾者的健康素养、自我效能与生活质量的路径关系。结果 失能老人和配偶照顾者的健康素养、自我效能与生活质量的中位数分别为79.00、20.00、378.33,85.00、20.00、548.11。模型结果显示,双方的健康素养与自我效能均能够正向预测自身的生活质量,即主体效应显著（β=0.389,β=0.267,β=0.340,β=0.222;均P<0.05）;客体效应,失能老人的健康素养正向预测配偶照顾者的生活质量（β=0.138,P<0.001）,配偶照顾者的健康素养对失能老人的生活质量预测作用不显著（β=0.050,P=0.078）;双方的自我效能对对方生活质量的预测作用不显著（β=0.034,P=0.259;β=0.032,P=0.276）。结论 失能老人和配偶照顾者的生活质量受自身健康素养和自我效能的影响,失能老人的健康素养与配偶照顾者的生活质量存在一定的交互作用。提示我们应将失能老人和配偶照顾者视为一个整体,进行“捆绑式”健康赋能以提升他们的健康素养和自我效能水平,提高他们的生活质量。

关键词: 失能老人, 配偶照顾者, 健康素养, 自我效能, 生活质量, 主客体互倚模型

Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship among health literacy (HL), self-efficacy, and quality of life (QoL) among disabled elders and their spouse caregivers. Methods Convenience sampling was adopted to selected 1,086 disabled elders and their spouse caregivers in 7 provinces in China from December 2020 to June 2022 to conduct the questionnaire survey. The survey tools included the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale, Health Literacy Scale for Chronic Patients, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Short Form-36 Health Survey. The relationship among HL, self-efficacy, and QoL of disabled elders and their spouse caregivers were analyzed by the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model（APIM）. Results The median for HL, self-efficacy, and QoL of disabled elders and their spouse caregivers was 79.00, 20.00, 378.33, 85.00, 20.00, and 548.11 respectively. In terms of actor-effect, the HL and self-efficacy of disabled elders and their spouse caregivers had significant effects on their own QoL (β=0.389, β=0.267, β=0.340, β=0.222, all P<0.05). In terms of partner effect, the HL of disabled elders had a significant effect on the QoL of the spouse caregivers (β=0.138, P<0.001), while the HL of the spouse caregivers had no significant effect on QoL of the disabled elders (β=0.050, P=0.078). Self-efficacy of disabled elders and their spouse caregivers had significant effects on QoL (β=0.034, P=0.259; β=0.032, P=0.276). Conclusion The QoL of disabled elders and their spouse caregivers was affected by their own HL and self-efficacy, and the HL of disabled elders had a certain interaction with the QoL of their partners. To improve their QoL, disabled elders and their spouse caregivers should be viewed as a unit, and "bundling" health empowerment strategies to strengthen HL and self-efficacy should be implemented to improve their QoL.

Key words: disabled elder, spouse caregiver, health literacy, self-efficacy, quality of life, actor-partner interdependence model

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] 李钦云, 宋岳涛. 老年长期照护的国内外现状和展望[J]. 实用老年医学,2023, 37(1):83-86.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.01.021.
[2] 宋靓珺, 周显伟, 黄剑焜, 等. “老有所为”理论视阈下的老年配偶照顾者之价值重构[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2018, 11(1):21-27.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2018.01.004.
[3] Du S, Feng Z, Wang W, et al.A structural equation model linking health literacy, self-efficacy and quality of life in adults with coronary heart disease[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2022,22(1):285. DOI:10.1186/s12872-022-02720-8.
[4] 孙海燕, 秦阳, 徐益荣, 等. 癌症患者及其配偶二元应对与心理弹性的主体-客体互倚模型研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 60-64. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.06.060.
[5] 林晓露, 周春兰, 肖秀英, 等. 失能老年人及其配偶健康素养、赋能水平与生活质量的关系研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(8):985-991. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.08.014.
[6] 孙浩林. 慢性病病人健康素养量表的研究及其初步应用[D]. 上海:复旦大学, 2012.
[7] 刘芳, 李玉梅, 李奕, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理效能测评工具及其应用的研究进展[J].海军医学杂志, 2021, 42(3):384-386. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0754.2021.03.039.
[8] 李鲁, 王红妹, 沈毅. SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2002(2):38-42. DOI:10.3760/j:issn:0253-9624.2002.02.011.
[9] 刘畅, 伍新春. 主客体互倚性的成对模式及其检验[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 105-112. DOI:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.01.12.
[10] Svendsen MT, Bak CK, Sørensen K, et al.Associations of health literacy with socioeconomic position, health risk behavior, and health status: a large national population-based survey among Danish adults[J]. BMC Public Health, 2020,20(1):565. DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-08498-8.
[11] D'Arrigo-Patrick E, Samman SK, Knudson-Martin C. Moving from "I" to "We": a grounded theory analysis of couple therapy with liver patients and their partners[J]. Fam Process, 2020,59(4):1517-1529. DOI:10.1111/famp.12528.
[12] Chow EOW, Wong YY, Fok DYH, et al.Positive life stories of stroke-survivor's spousal caregiving in Hong Kong: lessons for policy and practice[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2021,291:114476. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114476.
[13] Emerson E, Fortune N, Llewellyn G, et al.Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: cross-sectional study[J]. Disabil Health J, 2021,14(1):100965. DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965.
[14] 黄奕清. 青岛市居民健康素养、自我效能与健康状况之间的关系研究[D]. 青岛:青岛大学, 2022. DOI: 10.27262/d.cnki.gqdau.2022.000459.
[15] Jovanic M, Zdravkovic M, Stanisavljevic D, et al.Exploring the importance of health literacy for the quality of life in patients with heart failure[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018,15(8):1761. DOI:10.3390/ijerph15081761.
[16] 张玲, 施玉梅, 易大莉, 等. 重庆市肺癌患者健康素养、自我效能、社会支持与生活质量的关系——一项基于结构方程模型的研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2023, 45(8): 780-785. DOI:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202210075.
[17] 王梓彤, 马松翠, 徐丽丽, 等. 肢体残疾人自我效能感、照顾质量与生活质量的关系[J].中国康复理论与实践, 2023, 29(3):340-348.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006?9771.2023.03.014.
[18] Thomson P, Howie K, Mohan A, et al.Evaluating perceptions of self-efficacy and quality of life in patients having coronary artery bypass grafting and their family caregivers[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2019, 34(3):250-257. DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000553.
[19] Van Cappellen P, Rice EL, Catalino LI, et al.Positive affective processes underlie positive health behaviour change[J].Psychol Health, 2018, 33(1):77-97.DOI:10.1080/08870446.2017.1320798.
[1] 王利敏, 方继红, 武凤芹, 朱晶, 陈婉宣. 运动恐惧在学龄期四肢骨折患儿自我效能与早期功能锻炼依从性间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 1-5.
[2] 刘琪, 刘佳丽, 刘玉, 杨丽敏, 范育英, 吕星, 覃惠英. 鼻咽癌患者诱导化疗序贯同期放化疗期间躯体-心理症状负担轨迹及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 1-6.
[3] 赵洁, 宋雅玲, 畅盼, 郭倩, 王锦华. 慢性心力衰竭患者及其照顾者心理弹性在疾病不确定感与生活质量间的主客体互倚中介模型研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 17-21.
[4] 朱心悦, 嵇冰聪, 蓝雪芬, 季晓珍. 糖尿病患者电子健康素养研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 36-39.
[5] 曾辉, 史艳茹, 李琦, 董艳, 徐远平, 梁苗苗. 666名军队医院护士医学叙事能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 73-78.
[6] 刘仲全, 杨秀, 傅忠华. 头颈癌患者女性配偶照顾者创伤后成长体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 73-78.
[7] 褚红, 陈雁, 韩世钰, 应秀华, 王蒨, 王莉慧, 伍淇子. 基于症状管理理论的多发性骨髓瘤患者干预方案的构建与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(21): 68-73.
[8] 李苗, 李红梅, 张俊, 李盼盼, 张宇彤, 王茜, 李沁瑶. 乳腺癌化疗患者自我倡权潜在类别及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 19-23.
[9] 潘婷, 陈艳, 孔方, 张爱玲, 陈丹蕾, 丁成亮. 克罗恩病患者及其配偶主观幸福感与婚姻调适的主客体效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 1-5.
[10] 姚瑶, 张敏, 陈雁, 王春. 用户体验视角下“互联网+”失能照护服务实施困境研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 1-7.
[11] 高梦珂, 张艳, 田雨同, 高月. 826名农村失能老人适应能力现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 56-60.
[12] 罗海琴, 谢日华, 梁绰意. 正念干预对不孕症女性心理健康和生活质量影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 28-34.
[13] 李章彰, 罗艳艳, 李根强. 韧性在服务型领导力与临床护士工作投入间的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(15): 1-6.
[14] 张娜, 江玉, 杨丽娜, 于清舒, 王音. 713名临床护士团队效能感现状及影响因素[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 69-73.
[15] 吴元虹, 王晓辉, 王宇宇, 高歌, 王哲, 吴善玉. 基于主客体互倚模型的老年糖尿病患者胰岛素用药依从性影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 24-29.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!