以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 7-11.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.08.007

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践现状及影响因素分析

潘姝丞1a, 卞丽芳1b, 骆华芳2, 黄旭叶1c, 黄昉芳1d, 曾颖1e, 王薇1a   

  1. 1.浙江大学医学院附属第一医院 a.护理部;b.肝胆胰外科;c.结直肠外科;d.重症医学科;e.胃肠外科,浙江 杭州 310003;
    2.义乌市中心医院 骨二科,浙江 义乌 322000
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-28 发布日期:2023-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 王薇（1965-）,女,浙江杭州人,博士,博士研究生导师,主任护师。E-mail：wangw2005@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:潘姝丞（1995-）,女,江西南昌人,硕士,博士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目（2020KY111）

Knowledge and practice of nurses on deep vein thrombosis risk and prophylaxis: a cross-sectional survey

PAN Shu-cheng1a, BIAN Li-fang1b, LUO Hua-fang2, Huang Xu-ye1c, HUANG Fang-fang1d, ZENG Yi1e, WANG Wei1a   

  1. 1a. Dept. of Nursing Administration; 1b. Dept. of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery; 1c. Dept. of Colorectal Surgery; 1d. Dept. of Critical Care Medicine; 1e. Dept. of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China;
    2. Dept. of Orthopedics, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu 322000, China
  • Received:2022-09-28 Published:2023-05-12

PDF (PC)

528

赞

摘要： 目的 调查护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践现状,并分析其影响因素。方法 采用方便抽样法,2022年5—6月抽取浙江省某3所三级医院959名临床护士作为研究对象。应用经本土化调适后的中文版深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践测评问卷对其进行调查。采用多重线性回归分析护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践的影响因素。结果 本组护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识分数为（29.75±3.10）分,准确率87.5%;预防实践分数为（69.08±7.82）分。其风险知识多重线性回归结果显示：受教育程度、N级护士、所在科室、曾接受静脉血栓栓塞症（含）或深静脉血栓形成培训种类、是否有静脉血栓栓塞症（含）或深静脉血栓形成培训需求5个变量进入回归方程（P<0.001）;其预防实践多重线性回归结果显示：所在科室、是否曾接受静脉血栓栓塞症或深静脉血栓形成相关培训、静脉血栓栓塞症或深静脉血栓形成培训种类、培训效果评价4个变量进入回归方程（P<0.001）。结论 护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践水平总体较好,其中风险因素是深静脉血栓形成风险知识的薄弱环节。护士受教育程度、不同护士层级、不同科室、是否曾接受静脉血栓栓塞症或深静脉血栓形成相关培训、培训种类、培训效果评价是影响护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践的因素。医院管理者应注重加强护士对深静脉血栓形成风险因素的认知水平,同时改善医院静脉血栓栓塞相关防范管理制度及培训效果,进一步提高护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践水平。

关键词: 静脉血栓栓塞症, 深静脉血栓形成, 护士, 风险, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate the knowledge and practice of nurses on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk and prophylaxis. Methods Convenient sampling was used to select 959 clinical nurses from 3 tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang province from May and June 2022. Nurses were investigated by using the Chinese version of Knowledge and Practice of Nurses on DVT Risk and Prophylaxis. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influencing factors. Results The score of nurses' knowledge on DVT risk was 29.75±3.10, with an overall accuracy rate of 87.5%. The score of nurses' practice of DVT prophylaxis was 69.08±7.82. Multiple linear regression showed that education background, classification of nursing levels, clinical departments, previous DVT-related training type, and need for further training on DVT were influencing factors of nurses' risk knowledge of DVT (P<0.001). While nurses' practice of DVT prophylaxis were influenced by clinical departments, previous DVT-related training, DVT-related training type, and training effect assessment(P<0.001). Conclusion The recruited nurses' knowledge and practice on DVT risk and prophylaxis are generally good, but they have inadequate knowledge on DVT risk factors. Education background, classification of nursing levels, clinical departments, previous DVT-related training type, and training effect assessment are influence factors. Strengthened nurses' knowledge on DVT risk factors, and improved DVT prevention system and training effect are beneficial to promote the knowledge and practice of nurses on DVT risk and prophylaxis.

Key words: venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, nurse, risk, analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] 刘兴红, 李素云, 喻姣花, 等. 医院内静脉血栓栓塞护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(21):21-25. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.21.021.
[2] 全国肺栓塞和深静脉血栓形成防治能力建设项目. 关于同意开展加强肺栓塞和医院内静脉血栓栓塞症防治能力建设项目(国卫医资源便函[2018]139 号)[EB/OL]. (2018-10-13) [2022-08-11] https://www.thrombosischina.cn/news/xq/?tid=1&id=7.
[3] Ma YF, Xu Y, Chen Y P, et al.Nurses' objective knowledge regarding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a national survey study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(14):1-7. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000010338.
[4] Al-Mugheed KA, Bayraktar N.Knowledge and practices of nurses on deep vein thrombosis risks and prophylaxis: a descriptive cross sectional study[J]. J Vasc Nurs, 2018, 36(2): 71-80. DOI:10.1016/j.jvn.2018.02.001.
[5] 褚玮. 对护士DVT知识及预防行为测评量表的汉化及应用研究[D]. 湖州:湖州师范学院, 2020.
[6] 国家卫生健康委办公厅. 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发2021年国家医疗质量安全改进目标的通知[EB/OL]. (2021-02-09)[2023-08-11]http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-02/22/content_5588240.htm.
[7] Oh H, Boo S, Lee J A.Clinical nurses' knowledge and practice of venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prevention in South Korea: a cross-sectional survey[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2017, 26(3-4):427-435.DOI:10.1111/jocn.13424.
[8] Yohannes S, Abebe T, Endalkachew K, et al. Nurses' knowledge, perceived practice,their associated factors regarding deep venous thrombosis(DVT) prevention in Amhara Region Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021: a cross-sectional study[J]. Crit Care Res Pract, 2022(7386597):1-9. DOI:10.1155/2022/7386597.
[9] 中华医学会外科学分会. 中国普通外科围手术期血栓预防与管理指南[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2016, 54(5):321-327. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.05.001.
[10] 刘婷, 赵顺莹, 王灵聪, 等. 脑出血患者静脉血栓栓塞机械预防的证据总结[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(6):935-939. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.06.027.
[11] 褚玲玲, 陈萍, 冯丹, 等. 肿瘤相关静脉血栓栓塞症防治指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(16): 43-48. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.16.043.
[12] Mehta Y, Bhave A.A review of venous thromboembolism risk assessment models for different patient populations: what we know and don't![J]. Medicine, 2023, 102(2):1-8. DOI:10.1097/md.0000000000032398.
[13] Zhai Z, Kan Q, Li W, et al.VTE risk profiles and prophylaxis in medical and surgical inpatients: the identification of Chinese hospitalized patients' risk profile for venous thromboembolism (DissolVE-2)-A cross-sectional Study[J]. Chest, 2019, 155(1):114-122.DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.020.
[14] Kakkos S K, Gohel M, Baekgaard N, et al.Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery(ESVS) 2021 clinical practice guidelines on the management of venous thrombosis[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2021, 61(1):9-82. DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.09.023.
[15] Pandor A, Tonkins M, Goodacre S, et al.Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review[J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(7): 1-19. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045672.
[16] 任爽, 李大江, 胡果, 等. 医院规范化静脉血栓栓塞症防治与管理体系的建立[J]. 华西医学, 2017, 32(2):258-261. DOI:10.7507/1002-0179.201512097.
[17] 赵红乐, 代玲玉, 吕梦, 等. 基于信息化平台院内静脉血栓栓塞风险管理系统的构建及应用[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(24):9-12. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.24.009.
[18] Zhang Z, Lei J, Shao X, et al.Trends in Hospitalization and in-hospital mortality from VTE, 2007 to 2016, in China[J]. Chest, 2019,155(2):342-353. DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.040.
[1] 李丹妮, 邱丽燕, 吴隆燕, 谭铮可可, 陈欣, 杨丽. 前交叉韧带损伤日间手术患者恐动症的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 12-17.
[2] 田美雨, 王翠玲, 高若男, 田佳, 刘怡. 妇科肿瘤科护士性健康照护培训方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 18-23.
[3] 彭琦, 吴婉英, 谢玲女. 造口伤口失禁专科护士培训中基于ADDIE模型案例教学的实践及效果评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 24-27.
[4] 杜易梅, 刘莉, 郭立丽, 卢吉, 付苗苗, 刘杰. 妇科恶性肿瘤患者性健康研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 28-33.
[5] 郑小静, 严红虹, 李慧景, 陈思涓, 陈秀梅. 肝细胞癌伴低血糖症风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 53-58.
[6] 伍丽华, 吴心雨, 赖湘瑜, 邓宝贵, 黄泽青, 赵耀, 廖源, 沈彩萍, 李瑜. 人工关节置换术后患者深静脉血栓风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 12-16.
[7] 吴超瑜, 刘尚昆. 麻醉恢复室护士危机管理能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 17-21.
[8] 李苗苗, 熊莉娟, 齐磊, 李敏, 向御婷. 基于Ridit分析法和秩和比法的疾病诊断相关分组在护理绩效管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 22-26.
[9] 郝瑞霞, 王秀梅, 蔚玲, 郭越, 张学. 磁性医院管理理念对手术室护士出勤主义行为的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 27-31.
[10] 李长娥, 徐真真, 张文忠, 吴燕, 季红. 新生儿父母脐带血储存决策影响因素的定性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 74-78.
[11] 魏利, 赵兴颖, 刘佳, 何雨璇, 陈晓梅, 杨雪, 鲜继淑, 杨燕妮. 神经外科重症住院患者家庭照顾者照顾负担及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 1-6.
[12] 杨蓓, 叶红芳, 张宁, 相卢伟, 路诗雨. 老年2型糖尿病患者体力活动现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 7-12.
[13] 李雪, 廖常菊, 张健, 丁娟, 陈晓丽, 胡玉庭. 三级甲等医院ICU护士睡眠障碍的风险预测模型构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 63-69.
[14] 李静依, 梁冠冕, 缪群芳, 赵月琰, 王晓宁, 钱萍萍. 临床护士死亡工作自我应对能力潜在剖面及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 13-18.
[15] 刘畅, 张维, 王翠雪, 岳鹏. ICU实施非限制性探视制度的影响因素研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 34-38.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!