以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (19): 6-10.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.19.006

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

社区老年人对陪护机器人使用意愿的质性研究

何秋1, 何瑛1, 李贵妃1, 陈小玲2, 李丽君1, 王瑶1, 刘婕1, 马丹1, 刘倩1   

  1. 1.湖南师范大学 医学院,湖南 长沙410013;
    2.长沙市岳麓区咸嘉湖社区卫生服务中心 护理部,湖南 长沙 410205
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-25 发布日期:2022-11-08
  • 通讯作者: 何瑛（1984-）,女,湖南岳阳人,博士,讲师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:51228486@qq.com
  • 作者简介:何秋（1995-）,女,湖南祁阳人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护士。
  • 基金资助:
    2019年度国家社会科学基金项目（19CSH075）

Willingness to Use Accompanying Robots in the Elderly in Community：A Qualitative Study

HE Qiu1, HE Ying1, LI Gui-fei1, CHEN Xiao-ling2, LI Li-jun1, WANG Yao1, LIU Jie1, MA Dan1, LIU Qian1   

  1. 1. Medical College, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410013, China;
    2. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Xianjiahu Community Health Service Center of Yuelu District in Changsha City, Changsha 410205, China
  • Received:2022-05-25 Published:2022-11-08

PDF (PC)

746

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨社区老年人对陪护机器人使用意愿。方法 采用目的抽样法,于2021年6—7月,选取长沙市某社区的20名老年人进行半结构式访谈,采用扎根理论研究方法并借助NVivo12plus软件对访谈资料进行开放性编码、主轴性编码、选择性编码和理论饱和度检验,提炼社区老年人使用陪护机器人意愿的主题。结果 研究共形成32个初始范畴,10个主范畴,共提炼出3个主题：感知技术支持（技术-任务适配不足、拟人化程度低和外观-偏好不平衡）、感知行为控制（技术有用性感知弱、技术易用性感知弱、可接触性低和无购买力）与感知价值（功能价值期望高、技术价值期望高、情感价值期望高）。结论 陪护机器人使用意愿受感知技术支持和感知行为控制外部因素的直接影响和感知价值内部因素的间接影响,通过重视内部因素来强化外部因素提高老年人使用意愿,有利于推动机器人辅助养老模式的开展。

关键词: 陪护机器人, 智能辅助养老, 老年人, 使用意愿, 质性研究

Abstract: Objective To explore the willingness of the elderly in the community to use accompanying robot. Methods With purposive sampling, 20 elderly people in one community in Changsha were selected for semi-structured interview from June to July 2021. Grounded theory was used to conduct open coding, main axis coding, and open coding of interview data with NVivo12plus software. Selective coding and theoretical saturation test were applied to extract the themes of the elderly's willingness to use accompanying robot. Results Thirty-two concepts and ten first-level categories were formed and three themes were extracted: perceived technical support (insufficient technology-task adaptation, low degree of anthropomorphism, and appearance-preference imbalance), perceptual behavior control (weak perception of technical usefulness, weak perception of technical ease of use, low accessibility, and no purchasing power) and perceived value (high functional value expectation, high technical value expectation, and high emotional value expectation). Conclusion The willingness to use accompanying robot is directly affected by external factors of perceived technical support and perceptual behavior control and indirectly by internal factor of perceived value. Both internal and external factors work jointly to enhance the willingness of the elderly to use accompanying robot, which is helpful to promote the development of robot-assisted pension model.

Key words: accompanying robot, intelligence care for the elderly, the elderly, willingness to use, qualitative research

中图分类号: 

  • R473.2
[1] 董克用,王振振,张栋.中国人口老龄化与养老体系建设[J].经济社会体制比较,2020(1):53-64.
[2] 周滢,李峥.人工智能技术在老年护理中应用的研究进展[J].中国护理管理,2018,18(6):777-780. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.06.012.
[3] Ya-Huei W, Jérémy W, Mélanie C,et al.Acceptance of an Assistive Robot in Older Adults: A Mixed-method Study of Human-robot Interaction Over a 1-month Period in the Living Lab setting[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2014, 9:801-811.DOI:10.2147/CIA.S56435.
[4] 向运华,王晓慧. 智能陪护:老年人心理健康管理的新路径[J].甘肃社会科学,2019(4):125-131.DOI:10.15891/j.cnki.cn62-1093/c.2019.04.018.
[5] 程子真,张琪,甘燕玲.机器人在老年人家庭护理中的应用研究进展[J].护理学报,2019,26(9):42-45.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.09.042.
[6] 彭胜,王玉玲,孙雨晴,张斯清.陪伴型机器人在老年护理中应用的研究进展[J].中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(10):1397-1400.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200628-04110.
[7] Goher KM, Mansouri N, Fadlallah SO.Assessment of Personal Care and Medical Robots from Older Adults' Perspective[J].Robotics Biomim, 2017, 4(1):5.DOI:10.1186/s40638-017-0061-7.
[8] 许丽颖,喻丰.机器人接受度的影响因素[J].科学通报,2020,65(6):496-510.DOI:10.1360/TB-2019-0136.
[9] 汪玉洁,李君.约翰逊行为系统模式在护理质性研究中的应用探讨[J].解放军护理杂志,2016,33(16):46-48.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2016.16.012.
[10] Creswell JW.Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions[M].Thousand Oaks: Sage,1998:883-884.
[11] Louie WG, McColl D, Nejat G. Acceptance and Attitudes Toward a Human-like Socially Assistive Robot by Older Adults[J]. Assist Technol, 2014, 26(3):140.DOI:10.1080/10400435.2013.869703.
[12] Beer JM,Prakash A,Smarr CA, et al.Older Users' Acceptance of an Assistiv-e Robot: A-ttitudinal Changes Following Brief Exposure[J]. Gerontechnology, 2017, 16(1):21-36.DOI:10.4017/gt.2017.16.1.003.00.
[13] Huang T, Huang C.Elderly's Acceptance of Companion Robots from the Perspective of User Factors[J].Univers Access Inf Soc, 2020, 19(4):935-948.DOI:10.1007/s10209-019-00692-9.
[14] Edgington ES.Review of the Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research[J]. Can J Exp Psychol, 1967, 8a(4):360-360.DOI:10.1037/h0083159.
[15] Corbin J, Strauss A.Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria[J]. Qual Sociol, 1990, 19(6):418-427.DOI:10.1007/BF00988593.
[16] Fassinger RE. Paradigms, Praxis, Problems, and Promise: Grounded Theory in Counseling Psychology Research[J]. J Couns Psychol, 2005, 52(2):156-166.DOI:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.156.
[17] Epley N,Waytz A,Cacioppo JT.On Seeing Human: A Three-factor Theory of Anthropomorphism[J].Psychol Rev, 2007, 114(4):864-886.DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
[18] 许丽颖,喻丰,邬家骅,等.拟人化:从“它”到“他”[J].心理科学进展,2017,25(11):1942-1954.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01942.
[19] Moyle W, Cooke M, Beattie E, et al.Exploring the Effect of Companion Robots on Emotional Expression in Older Adults with Dementia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial[J].J Gerontol Nurs, 2013, 39(5):46-53.DOI:10.3928/00989134-20130313-03.
[20] 陈发俊,姜子豪.老年智能产品的应用前景与伦理风险[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(1):21-28.DOI:DOI10.16452/j.cnki.sdkjsk.2021.01.003.
[1] 吴超瑜, 刘尚昆. 麻醉恢复室护士危机管理能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 17-21.
[2] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[3] 谭雯渲, 张容, 张立力, 王玮, 邵艳红, 方庆虹, 朱瑾. 心脏移植患者手术决策困境的现象学研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 69-73.
[4] 曹敏, 张培莉, 侯晓雅, 高超越, 郭林芳, 李滢. ABC-X模型下结直肠癌化疗患者照顾者营养照护体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 13-18.
[5] 陈玉英, 王海彦, 陈思颖, 杨雪娟. 老年人自立支援照护模式的照护技巧及启示[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 31-36.
[6] 孙娟, 李亚莉, 马安娜, 王华, 张会敏. 护理研究生对社区护理实践思政教学体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 19-23.
[7] 谭丘羽, 邓一芯, 冀婉倩, 王冬华. 农村老年人自我刻板化与主观记忆抱怨在自我感知老化与痴呆恐惧间的链式中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 56-61.
[8] 王语, 赵慧杰, 肖梦伟, 范硕宁, 孙佳丽, 王珂心, 苏炫, 杨滢瑞. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者硅油填充期间疾病体验与应对的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 68-72.
[9] 冯春玲, 胡夏晴, 徐琳, 蔡鑫健, 徐琴鸿. 基于社会生态系统理论的电话指导公众实施心肺复苏行为动机及需求的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 66-71.
[10] 曹依丽, 王玲, 王灿, 陈燕华, 秦虹云. 精神分裂症住院患者家属资源取向的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 74-78.
[11] 马瑞瑞, 范晓莉, 徐姝娟, 张伟, 陈婷, 谈飞飞. 护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 6-11.
[12] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[13] 龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27-31.
[14] 张颖, 车晓艳, 万婠, 秦雪, 张恩思, 崇武, 郑淑娟. 我国性治疗护士工作范畴和核心能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 68-72.
[15] 张露心, 焦延超, 文稀, 田利, 王婷, 田凤美, 李惠玲. 护理本科生在“慕课西行”同步课堂学习体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 30-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!