以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (13): 17-20.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.13.017

• 护理教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

皮肤损伤多中心研究前混合模式和视频播放模式培训参研护士的效果比较

蒋琪霞1, 陈倩竹2, 赵静3, 陈德凤4, 封海霞5, 潘晓虹6, 洪艳燕7, 俞萍8, 黄仕明9, 王春立10, 马芳11, 徐芳芳12, 于秀娟13   

  1. 1.中国人民解放军东部战区总医院 烧伤整形科,江苏 南京 210002;
    2.重庆医科大学附属第一医院 骨科,重庆 400016;
    3.江苏省人民医院 门诊治疗室,江苏 南京 210009;
    4.广西壮族自治区人民医院 胃肠疝肠瘘外科,广西 南宁 530021;
    5.东南大学附属中大医院护理部,江苏 南京 210009;
    6.荆州市中心医院,湖北 荆州 434000;
    7.南京市中医院,江苏 南京 210000;
    8.无锡市第二人民医院 重症医学科,江苏 无锡 214002;
    9.遵义医科大学附属医院 护理部,贵州 遵义 630005;
    10.南方医科大学深圳医院伤口中造口护理专科,广东 深圳 518000;
    11.中国医科大学附属第四医院 造口伤口护理门诊,辽宁 沈阳 110032;
    12.合肥市第一人民医院 伤口造口门诊,安徽 合肥 230061;
    13.连云港市第二人民医院 伤口造口门诊,江苏 连云港 222000
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-22 出版日期:2022-07-10 发布日期:2022-08-02
  • 作者简介:蒋琪霞（1963-）,女,硕士,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail：jiangqixia1963@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海王正国创伤医学发展基金会课题（WZGF20200101）; 军队保健专项课题（21BJZ38）

Effects of Two Training Methods in Nurses Before Participating in Multicenter Study of Skin Injury in the Elderly

JIANG Qi-xia1, CHEN Qian-zhu2, ZHAO Jing3, CHEN De-feng4, FENG Hai-xia5, PAN Xiao-hong6, HONG Yan-yan7, YU Ping8, HUANG Shi-ming9, WANG Chun-li10, MA Fang11, XU Fang-fang12, YU Xiu-juan13   

  1. 1. Dept. of Burn and Plastic Surgery, General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Nanjing 210002, China;
    2. Dept. of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China;
    3. Outpatient Treatment Room, Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China;
    4. Dept. of Gastro-intestinal Fistula Hernia Surgery, People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530021, China;
    5. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China;
    6. Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou 434000, China;
    7. Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210000, China;
    8. Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, the Second People’s Hospital of Wuxi, Wuxi 214002, China;
    9. Dept. Nursing Administration, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical Univeristy, Zunyi 630005, China;
    10. Specialist Care Center of Ostomy, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518000, China;
    11. Specialist Care Clinic of Ostomy, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110032, China;
    12. Wound and Ostomy Clinic, the First People’s Hospital of Hefei, Hefei 230061, China;
    13. Wound and Ostomy Clinic, the Second People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222000, China
  • Received:2021-12-22 Online:2022-07-10 Published:2022-08-02

PDF (PC)

291

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨多中心研究前混合模式和视频播放模式培训不同地区参与研究的三级甲等医院护士掌握老年人四类皮肤损伤知识的效果,为选择适宜方法培训参研人员提供依据。方法 招募入选19个省、自治区和直辖市的34所医院为多中心研究单位,各医院按照调研工作量和纳排标准纳入参研护士,共计766名自愿选择了A和B培训方法,A组523名接受在线培训结合培训视频播放混合模式培训,B组243名接受培训视频播放模式培训。培训内容一致,包含4种皮肤损伤定义、分类标准和检查方法等内容。项目组根据培训内容设计包含20张老年人四类皮肤损伤照片为题干的60个问题试卷,于培训1周后,通过微信将在线考试卷链接推送至参训护士。2组参训护士通过手机独立答题,并在1 h内在线提交。满分为100分,统计2组参训率和参考率及平均得分。结果 A、B 2组护士参训率和参考率均为100%,2组总平均得分相近,四类皮肤损伤的平均得分差异也无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。结论 2种培训方法均有满意的参训率和参考率,培训效果相近,适用于多中心研究前不同地区医院参研护士的在职培训。

关键词: 在职培训, 伤口和损伤, 老年人, 护士

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of two training methods on four types of skin injuries in the elderly for nurses from tertiary grade A hospitals in different regions before participating in multicenter study, and to provide reference for selecting appropriate training methods. Methods Thirty-four tertiary grade A hospitals in 19 provinces, or autonomous regions or municipalities were recruited as multicenter study units. A total of 766 nurses as participants were included and divided into group A and B. Nurses (n=523) in group A received online training combined with video training, and those (n=243) in group B the video training. The training content was the same in the two groups, including four types of skin injuries, stages (category), judgment basis and examination methods. A test paper of 60 questions including 20 photos of four types skin injuries in the elderly were used for evaluating the training effect through Wechat one week after the training, and nurses were required to submit the paper online within 1 hour. The rate of participating in the training and the test, and the average score was observed. Results All the nurses completed the training and online examination. The total average score and the average score of four types of skin injuries in the elderly in the two groups showed no statistical significance (all P>0.05). Conclusion The two training methods have similar effects and are appropriate for in-service training for nurses from hospitals in different regions before the multicenter study.

Key words: in-service training, wounds and injuries, the elderly, nurse

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] 杨章玲,付沫,蒋琪霞,等.参与压疮调研的临床护士岗位综合培训方法与效果分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(27):3865-3868.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.27.001.
[2] 颜萍,封海霞,谭靓靓,等. 多中心压疮研究调研人员培训效果分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(26):3825-3828.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.26.034.
[3] 蒋琪霞,刘云,祁静,等.12所综合性医院护士识别压疮分期准确率的情况分析[J].护理研究,2014,28(3B):914-916. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2014.08008.
[4] European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention,d Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline. The International Guideline. 3rd Edition.EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA[EB/OL](2019-11-16]. http://www.internationalguideline. com/
[5] Van den BK, Verhaeghe S, Van HA, et al. The Ghent Global IAD Monitoring Tool (GLOBIAD-M) to Monitor the Healing of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis (IAD): Design and Reliability Study[J]. Int Wound J, 2018,15(4):555-564.
[6] Van Tiggelen H, LeBlanc K, Campbell K, et al. Standardising the Classification of Skin Tears: Validity and Reliability Testing of the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel (ISTAP) Classification System in 44 Countries[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2020,183(1):146-154.DOI:10.1111/bjd.18604.
[7] Lechner A, Lahmann N, Lichterfeld-Kottner A,et al.Dry Skin and the Use of Leave-On Products in Nursing Care:A Prevalence Study in Nursing Homes and Hospitals[J].Nursing Open, 2019,6(1):189-196.DOI:10.1002/nop2.204.
[8] Hu L, Sae-Sia W, Kitrungrote L.Intensive Care Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Pressure Injury Prevention in China: A Cross-sectional Study[J]. Risk Manag Healthc Policy, 2021, 14(10):4257-4267.DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S323839.
[9] Fulbrook P, Lawrence P,Miles S.Australian Nurses’ Knowledge of Pressure Injury Prevention and Management: A Cross-sectional Survey[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2019, 46(2):106-112.DOI:10.1097/WON.0000000000000508.
[10] Lotfi M,Mirza Aghazadeh AM, Asgarpour H, et al.Iranian Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude and Behaviour on Skin Care, Prevention and Management of Pressure Injury: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study[J]. Nursing Open, 2019,6(8):1600-1605. DOI:10.1002/nop2.365.
[11] 蒋琪霞,韩小琴,李莹,等. 基于指南的皮肤撕裂伤预防方案实施效果的初步研究[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(24):3419-3422.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.24.004.
[12] Bliss DZ, Gurvich OV, Mathiason MA, et al.Prevention of Incontinence Associated Skin Damage in Nursing Homes: Disparities and Predictors[J].West J Nurs Res, 2017,39(5): 643-659. DOI:10.1177/0193945916666065.
[13] 陈梦云,蔡莹莹.医联体内护士中心静脉导管维护同质化培训[J].中华护理教育,2020,17(4):333-337.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2020.04.012.
[14] 蒋琪霞,彭青,王建荣. 基于典型病例的整体护理培训方法对伤口造口失禁专科护士的培训效果分析[J].中华护理教育,2021,18(4):293-297.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.04.001.
[15] 廖园园,周毅峰,秦月兰,等.预防术中俯卧位患者面部压力性损伤的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报,2020,27(15):39-43.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.15.039.
[16] 秦鸿利,赵震,王艳芳,等. ICU患者压力性损伤预防的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报,2021, 28(10):45-51.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.10.045.
[1] 田美雨, 王翠玲, 高若男, 田佳, 刘怡. 妇科肿瘤科护士性健康照护培训方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 18-23.
[2] 彭琦, 吴婉英, 谢玲女. 造口伤口失禁专科护士培训中基于ADDIE模型案例教学的实践及效果评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 24-27.
[3] 吴超瑜, 刘尚昆. 麻醉恢复室护士危机管理能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 17-21.
[4] 郝瑞霞, 王秀梅, 蔚玲, 郭越, 张学. 磁性医院管理理念对手术室护士出勤主义行为的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 27-31.
[5] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[6] 陈玉英, 王海彦, 陈思颖, 杨雪娟. 老年人自立支援照护模式的照护技巧及启示[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 31-36.
[7] 李雪, 廖常菊, 张健, 丁娟, 陈晓丽, 胡玉庭. 三级甲等医院ICU护士睡眠障碍的风险预测模型构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 63-69.
[8] 李静依, 梁冠冕, 缪群芳, 赵月琰, 王晓宁, 钱萍萍. 临床护士死亡工作自我应对能力潜在剖面及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 13-18.
[9] 谭丘羽, 邓一芯, 冀婉倩, 王冬华. 农村老年人自我刻板化与主观记忆抱怨在自我感知老化与痴呆恐惧间的链式中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 56-61.
[10] 王子萱, 原振青, 赵一鋆, 王惠平, 洪菲菲, 邹敏. 体面劳动感在三级甲等医院手术室护士反思能力与创新行为的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 62-67.
[11] 何娇, 刘义兰, 官春燕, 韩燕红, 陈睿, 胡德英. 基于泰勒原理的医院护理人文关怀培训课程体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 13-17.
[12] 徐晓东, 刘顺梅, 赵瑄, 丁秀娜. 显微根尖外科手术护士核心能力评价指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 69-73.
[13] 马瑞瑞, 范晓莉, 徐姝娟, 张伟, 陈婷, 谈飞飞. 护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 6-11.
[14] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[15] 龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27-31.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!