以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 67-71.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.03.067

• 临床护理:内科护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年慢性病患者健康赋能需求评估量表的研制及信效度检验

杨丽潇1,2, 周春兰1, 屠燕1, 谢翠华1, 吴艳妮1, 叶孝灵1, 王润1   

  1. 1.南方医科大学 南方医院,广东 广州 510515;
    2.南方医科大学 护理学院,广东 广州 510515
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-03-04
  • 通讯作者: 周春兰(1962-),女,湖南益阳人,硕士,主任护师,教授,博士研究生导师。E-mail: lanchun200488@126.com
  • 作者简介:杨丽潇(1997-),女,云南大理人,本科学历,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金-面上项目(72074106)

Construction of Health Empowerment Need Assessment Scale for Elderly Patients with Chronic Disease and Its Reliability and Validity

YANG Li-xiao1,2, ZHOU Chun-lan1, TU Yan1, XIE Cui-hua1, WU Yan-ni1, YE Xiao-ling1, WANG Run1   

  1. 1. Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2022-01-10 Published:2022-03-04

摘要: 目的 编制适用于我国老年慢性病患者的健康赋能需求评估量表,并检验其信效度。方法 在文献分析及参照国内外相关工具的基础上编制量表条目池;通过2轮德尔菲专家函询,形成测试版老年慢性病患者健康赋能需求评估量表。便利选取2021年3—12月在广州市某三级甲等综合医院住院的236例老年慢性病患者进行问卷调查,检验量表信效度。结果 最终形成的老年慢性病患者健康赋能需求评估量表包含5个维度、30个条目,经因子分析提取5个公因子,累计方差贡献率为64.24%;各条目内容效度指数为0.72~1.00,总量表内容效度指数为0.94;量表各维度Cronbach's α系数为0.78~0.90,折半系数为0.68~0.83;总量表Cronbach's α系数为0.92,折半系数为0.76。结论 本研究所研制的老年慢性病患者健康赋能需求评估量表可作为老年慢性病患者赋能需求评估的工具,为科学地制订和实施符合患者需求的个性化慢性病管理措施提供依据。

关键词: 老年, 慢性病, 健康赋能, 需求评估, 量表编制

Abstract: Objective To develop a health empowerment need assessment scale for elderly patients with chronic diseases in China, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods After literature review and with the reference of relevant tools, the initial item pool was compiled. Then the preliminary scale was developed after 2 rounds of Delphi expert consultations. A questionnaire survey was conducted in 236 elderly patients with chronic diseases in a tertiary grade-A comprehensive hospital in Guangzhou from March to December 2021 to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The final scale consisted of 30 items in 5 dimensions. The exploratory factor analysis extracted 5 common factors and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.24%. The content validity index of each item was 0.72~1.00, and the content validity index of the scale was 0.94. Internal consistency test showed that Cronbach's α coefficient and half reliability of each dimension were 0.78~0.90 and 0.68~0.83 respectively, while those of the total scale were 0.92 and 0.76 respectively. Conclusion The health empowerment need assessment scale for elderly patients with chronic diseases developed in this research can be used as a tool to assess the health need of elderly patients in chronically conditions, which can provide reference for scientifically formulating and implementing personalized chronic disease management to meet the needs of patients.

Key words: elderly patient, chronic disease, health empowerment, needs assessment, scale construction

中图分类号: 

  • R473.5
[1] 黄国桂,陈天航,陈功,等. 我国老年人健康预期寿命研究 ——基于主观健康维度的测算[J]. 人口与发展, 2021,27(3):74-84.
[2] 健康中国行动推进委员会.健康中国行动(2019—2030年)[EB/OL].(2019-07-09)[2021-12-20]. https://www.jkzgxd.cn/detial/684288.
[3] Fang M.Trends in Diabetes Management Among US Adults: 1999-2016[J]. J Gen Intern Med,2020,35(5):1427-1434. DOI:10.1007/s11606-019-05587-2.
[4] 孙一勤,姜安丽.慢性病患者赋能测量工具的研究进展[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(4):481-485.
[5] Zhou CL, Wang SQ, Wang YF, et al.A Chinese Version of the Patient Perceptions of Patient-Empowering Nurse Behaviours Scale: Reliability and Validity Assessment in Chronically Ill Patients[J]. J Clin Nurs,2019, 28(3-4):444-457. DOI:10.1111/jocn.14613.
[6] Vainauskien V, Vaitkien R.Enablers of Patient Knowledge Empowerment for Self-Management of Chronic Disease: An Integrative Review[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021,18(5):2247. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18052247.
[7] 龚伯雄,付伟.国外慢性病患者赋权量表研究进展[J].护理学报,2015,22(14):24-27.
[8] Ding D, Fu H, Bauman AE.Step It Up: Advancing Physical Activity Research to Promote Healthy Aging in China[J]. J Sport Health Sci, 2016, 5(3):255-257.DOI:10.1016/j.jshs.2016.06.003.
[9] Memon MA, Ting H, Hwa CJ, et al.Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations[J]. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 2020, 4(2):1-20. DOI:10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01.
[10] Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF.Evaluation of Methods Used For Estimating Content Validity[J]. Res Social Adm Pharm, 2019,15(2):214-221.DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066.
[11] Heinze G, Dunkler D.Five Myths About Variable Selection[J]. Transpl Int, 2017,30(1):6-10. DOI:10.1111/tri.12895.
[12] Rattray J, Jones MC.Essential Elements of Questionnaire Design and Development[J]. J Clin Nurs,2007,16(2):234-243.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
[13] Wang F, Huang L, Zhang H, et al.Factor Analysis and Psychometric Properties Adaption of Chinese Version of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10)[J]. Patient Prefer Adherence,2020,14:2027-2034.DOI:10.2147/PPA.S266687.
[14] Clark LA, Watson D.Constructing Validity: New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments[J]. Psychol Assess,2019,31(12):1412-1427.DOI:10.1037/pas0000626.
[15] 赵斐然,周天驰,张俊颖,等.量表(问卷)信度、效度评价在我国医学领域的应用与展望[J].中华中医药杂志,2014,29(7):2280-2283.
[16] Angwenyi V, Aantjes C, Bunders-Aelen J, et al.Patient-provider Perspectives on Self-Management Support and Patient Empowerment in Chronic Care: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Rural Sub-Saharan Setting[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2019,75(11):2980-2994. DOI:10.1111/jan.14116.
[17] 孙一勤,姜安丽.慢性病健康赋能理论研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,2017,33(9):700-703.
[18] Bieri M, del Río Carral M, Santiago-Delefosse M, et al. Beliefs about Polypharmacy among Home-Dwelling Older Adults Living with Multiple Chronic Conditions, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Qualitative Study[J]. Healthcare (Basel), 2021,9(9):1204. DOI:10.3390/healthcare9091204.
[19] 张艳双,张宇萌,张琳琳,等.英国“专家患者计划”及其对我国赋权慢性病患者的启示[J].中国医学伦理学,2021,34(5):577-580.
[20] Palmer K, Onder G.Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: Benefits and Limitations[J]. Eur J Intern Med, 2018,54:e8-e9. DOI:10.1016/j.ejim.2018.02.016.
[21] 赵艺璞,李智,李亚琴,等.老年人健康照护需求自评问卷的信效度评价[J].中国实用护理杂志,2015, 31(33):2506-2511.
[22] Rajabi G, Namadmalan M, Dijkstra A, et al.Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Care Dependency Scale in Nursing Homes[J]. Rehabil Nurs, 2017,42(4):216-222. DOI:10.1002/rnj.270.
[23] 杨丽潇,周春兰,叶孝灵,等.国内外老年人健康需求评估工具的研究现状及启示[J].护理学报, 2021,28(21):36-40.
[24] Zhao D,Zhang Z.Qualitative Analysis of Direction of Public Hospital Reforms in China[J].Front Med,2018,12(2):218-223. DOI:10.1007/s11684-017-0534-7.
[1] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[2] 杨蓓, 叶红芳, 张宁, 相卢伟, 路诗雨. 老年2型糖尿病患者体力活动现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 7-12.
[3] 陈玉英, 王海彦, 陈思颖, 杨雪娟. 老年人自立支援照护模式的照护技巧及启示[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 31-36.
[4] 夏碧芸, 陈瑜, 吴彦妍, 胡雁. 降低经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后老年患者桡动脉闭塞发生的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 37-43.
[5] 刘硕怡, 熊莉娟, 李凌, 王玉梅, 何嘉, 李鑫, 袁淑蕾, 郭雪琴, 王暘婧, 张慧娟. 老年住院患者衰弱预防及管理临床实践指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[6] 闫亚铃, 乐美妮, 姚桃琴, 王雪莲, 姜建玲, 辛艺. 老年胃肠肿瘤患者围手术期衰弱管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 74-78.
[7] 谭丘羽, 邓一芯, 冀婉倩, 王冬华. 农村老年人自我刻板化与主观记忆抱怨在自我感知老化与痴呆恐惧间的链式中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 56-61.
[8] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[9] 姚晨晨, 陈娟, 杨雷. 老年衰弱患者基于埃德蒙顿衰弱量表评估分层抗阻运动的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 73-78.
[10] 薛荣, 张开利, 陈保云, 马荣慧, 张雨欣. 中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹及其影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 6-12.
[11] 李爱群, 李利花, 王芳, 蒋源元, 蔡益民. 慢性病资源利用在冠心病PCI术后患者自我超越与自我管理行为间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 13-17.
[12] 邓悦, 胡宇帆, 王冉, 张远星, 王芳, 袁萍, 陈璐. 老年患者接受远程医疗护理体验与需求质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 50-55.
[13] 郑晓婷, 田霞, 王峥, 肖文莉. King达标理论在慢性病家庭护理中应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 56-60.
[14] 王薇, 周演铃, 薛文萍, 张淋淋, 林书球. 老年髋部骨折患者衰弱评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 42-47.
[15] 喻建芳, 曾超超, 吴俊琪. 安宁疗护病房住院患者的基于需求评估的护理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 75-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!