以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 66-70.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.09.066

• 临床护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表对手术患者压力性损伤预测效果的研究

龚艳1, 蒋琪霞2a, 陈文芳2b, 王海宏3a, 马丽3b   

  1. 1.南京中医药大学 护理学院,江苏 南京210023;
    2.中国人民解放军东部战区总医院 a.烧伤整形科; b.泌尿外科,江苏 南京 210002;
    3.徐州市中心医院 a.妇科; b.肿瘤外科,江苏 徐州 221200
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-13 出版日期:2021-05-10 发布日期:2021-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 蒋琪霞（1963-）,女,江苏无锡人,硕士,主任护师,护士长。E-mail:jiangqixia1963@163.com
  • 作者简介:龚艳（1985-）,女,江苏徐州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,主管护师。
  • 基金资助:
    上海王正国创伤医学发展基金会课题（WZGF20200101）

A Comparative Study of Predictive Effects of Three Assessment Scales on Surgical Acquired Pressure Injuries

GONG Yan1, JIANG Qi-xia2a, CHEN Wen-fang2b, WANG Hai-hong3a, MA Li3b   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China;
    2a. Dept. of Burn and Plastic Surgery; 2b. Dept. of Urology, General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Nanjing 210002, China;
    3a. Dept. of Gynecology; 3b. Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou 221200, China
  • Received:2021-01-13 Online:2021-05-10 Published:2021-06-09

PDF (PC)

625

赞

摘要： 目的 比较并评价手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表、Braden性压力性损伤风险评估量表、Munro围术期成人压力性损伤风险评估量表对外科择期手术患者手术获得性压力损伤的预测效果,为临床选择使用适宜量表提供依据。方法 选取2所三级甲等医院2019年12月—2020年6月外科择期手术患者237例,应用3种量表于术前、术中、术后对患者进行压力性损伤风险评估和皮肤检查。比较3种量表的预测效果和操作便利性。结果 手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表、Braden压力性损伤风险评估量表、Munro围术期成人压力性损伤风险评估量表,术前ROC曲线下面积AUC分别为0.695、0.619、0.684;术中ROC曲线下面积AUC分别为0.848、0.633、0.882;术后ROC曲线下面积AUC分别为0.861、0.757、0.870;3种量表的评估用时比较,手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表评估用时最短。结论 手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表对手术获得性压力性损伤患者预测能力较好,方便使用,值得临床推广应用。

关键词: 手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表, Braden量表, Munro量表, 手术, 压力性损伤, 风险评估

Abstract: Objective To compare and evaluate the prediction effect of Intraoperatively Acquired Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale, Braden Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale and the Munro Assessment Scale for pressure injury risk in adult patients with selective operations, and to provide reference for appropriate scale of clinical practice. Methods A total of 237 patients with selective operations from December 2019 to June 2020 were selected from two tertiary, grade A hospitals and they were surveyed by using the three scales to assess the risk of pressure injury and skin examination for each patient before, during and after the surgery. The prediction effect and operation convenience of the three scales were analyzed and compared. Results For intraoperatively acquired pressure injury risk assessment scale, Braden pressure injury risk assessment scale and the Munro assessment scale for pressure injury risk, the AUC of preoperative area under the ROC curve of the three scale during perioperative period was 0.695, 0.619 and 0.684, respectively; that was 0.848, 0.633 and 0.882, respectively during the surgery and that after the operation was 0.861, 0.757 and 0.870, respectively. By comparing the assessment time of the three scales, the assessment time of intraoperatively acquired pressure injury risk assessment scale was the shortest. Conclusion The intraoperatively acquired pressure injury risk assessment scale has good predictive effect in patients with surgical acquired pressure injury. It is convenient and worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Intraoperatively Acquired Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale, Braden Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale, Munro Assessment Scale, operation, pressure injury, risk assessment

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] 蒋琪霞,苗素琴,陈文芳,等.手术获得性压力性损伤流行特征和危险评估新进展[J].医学研究生学报,2019,32(8):882-885.DOI:10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199.2019.08.019.
[2] Shafipour V, Ramezanpour E, Gorji MA, el at. Prevalence of Postoperative Pressure Ulcer:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J].Electron Physician,2016,8(11):3170-3176.DOI:10.19082/3170.
[3] 蒋琪霞,瞿小龙,郭秀君,等.手术患者压疮发生率及发生时间和影响因素研究[J].中国护理管理,2013,13(9):25-28.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2013.09.009.
[4] Kimsey DB.A Change in Focus: Shifting from Treatment to Prevention of Perioperative Pressure Injuries[J]. AORN J, 2019,110(4):379-393. DOI:10.1002/aorn.12806.
[5] 杨龙飞,宋冰,倪翠萍,等.2019版《压力性损伤的预防和治疗:临床实践指南》更新解读[J].中国护理管理,2020,20(12):1849-1854.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.12.019.
[6] 黄灿,马玉霞,蒋梦瑶,等.压力性损伤风险评估工具的研究进展[J].上海护理,2021, 21(1):50-51.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2021.01.014.
[7] 陈文芳,蒋琪霞,苗素琴,等.手术获得性压力性损伤风险评估量表的构建[J].东南国防医药,2021,23(1):81-83.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2021.01.019.
[8] Chen HL,Cao YJ,Zhang W,el at. Braden scale (ALB) for Assessing Pressure Ulcer Risk in Hospital Patients: A Validity and Reliability Study[J].Appl Nurs Res, 2017,33:169-174.DOI:10.1016/j. apnr.2016.12.001.
[9] Li DX, Tang J,Gan XN.Reliability and Validity of the Munro Scale On the Assessment of Pressure Ulcer Risk in Adult Perioperative Patients:Across-sectional Study[J]. IntJClin Exp Med,2018,11(9):9811-9818.
[10] 李冬雪,盛孝敏,唐佳,等.改良版Munro围术期成人压疮风险评估量表在手术患者压疮评估中的预测性研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2018(2):297-301.DOI:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.001484.
[11] 于文君,张晓红,蒋紫娟,等.Munro与Waterlow评估量表在神经外科手术患者压疮预测的效果评价[J]. 护士进修杂志,2019,34(13):1170-1174.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2019.13.005.
[12] Mrdjenovich D,Simman R,Fleck C,et al.The American College of Clinical Wound Specialists Rebuttal to the Recent NPUAP Pressure Ulcer Definition[J].JAm Coll Clin Wound Spec,2016,7(1-3):53.DOI:10.1016/j.jccw.08.002.
[13] 喻海涛,孙琳,韩小琴,等.3种创伤严重程度评分方法对老年创伤患者院内死亡预测价值的比较研究[J].护理学报,2020,27(8):34-37.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.034.
[14] 倪洁,葛兆霞.衰弱前期老年患者运动衰弱干预试验效果观察[J].护理学报,2019,26(15):65-69.DOI:10.164660/j.issn1008-9969.2019.15.065.
[15] 龚艳,蒋琪霞.手术获得性压力性损伤危险因素及预防策略的研究进展[J].中华现代护理杂志,2020,26(25):3409-3413.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200218-00798.
[16] 洪佳莹,吴彦,赵洁.汉化版Munro成人手术室压疮风险评估表在全身麻醉手术中的应用研究[J].中国医药科学,2019,9(5):153-155.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2019.05.045.
[17] 颜虹,徐勇勇.医学统计学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:220-236.
[18] Park SH, Choi YK, Kang CB.Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Hospitalized Patients[J].JTissue Viability, 2015,24(3):102-113. DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2015.05.001.
[19] 蒋琪霞. 压疮护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2015:102-105.
[20] 张安美,李照坤,郑宏伟.改良压疮评估量表用于骨科手术病人压力性损伤评估的可行性分析[J].潍坊医学院学报,2020,42(5):391-393.DOI:10.16846/j.issn.1004-3101.2020.05.022.
[1] 李丹妮, 邱丽燕, 吴隆燕, 谭铮可可, 陈欣, 杨丽. 前交叉韧带损伤日间手术患者恐动症的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 12-17.
[2] 张静, 彭焕椽, 陈佳, 鲁永锦, 刘克玄, 侯晓敏. 成人体外循环心脏手术患者预防手术部位感染的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 41-47.
[3] 刘璐, 朱钰, 曹义, 张华, 彭玉娜. 腹腔热灌注化疗患者术中实施不同目标体温管理的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 59-63.
[4] 郝瑞霞, 王秀梅, 蔚玲, 郭越, 张学. 磁性医院管理理念对手术室护士出勤主义行为的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 27-31.
[5] 闫亚铃, 乐美妮, 姚桃琴, 王雪莲, 姜建玲, 辛艺. 老年胃肠肿瘤患者围手术期衰弱管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 74-78.
[6] 毕雅昕, 端烨, 何丽君, 徐秒, 龚荣花. 减重代谢术后骨质疏松症预防与管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 44-49.
[7] 王子萱, 原振青, 赵一鋆, 王惠平, 洪菲菲, 邹敏. 体面劳动感在三级甲等医院手术室护士反思能力与创新行为的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 62-67.
[8] 陈莹莹, 丁红, 张根生. 患儿术后谵妄影响因素的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 32-35.
[9] 华晶, 张青月, 王燕, 程畅, 张秀丽, 张爱爱. 问题提示清单在乳腺癌手术患者中的应用研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 18-22.
[10] 陈思齐, 刘宁, 侯晓敏, 卢舒颖. 机器人胃癌手术围术期加速康复外科护理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 31-36.
[11] 徐晓东, 刘顺梅, 赵瑄, 丁秀娜. 显微根尖外科手术护士核心能力评价指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 69-73.
[12] 周毅峰, 杨继平, 胡正中, 袁浩. 肝癌切除手术患者目标导向性血糖监测的证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 46-50.
[13] 张明会, 张淼, 陈丽娟, 余满荣. 脱口秀科普作品创作在手术室护理临床教学中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 22-25.
[14] 吴觅之, 刘文生, 潘红英, 余红梅, 黄晨. 住院患者器械相关压力性损伤的数据挖掘及防范对策分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 34-38.
[15] 魏永婷, 席祖洋, 田书梅, 谢丹, 郑一宁. 基于个人绩效四维模型的肿瘤专科医院手术室护士绩效考核指标的焦点小组访谈研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 30-35.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!