以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 38-42.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.05.038

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

成人患者气管切开护理相关临床实践指南的质量评价及内容分析

尚苗苗a, 王丽媛b, 张振美b, 颜丙萍a, 刘莉a, 杨丽娟b   

  1. 山东第一医科大学附属省立医院 a.神经外科; b.护理部,山东 济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-05 出版日期:2021-03-10 发布日期:2021-04-08
  • 通讯作者: 杨丽娟(1966-),女,山东菏泽人,硕士, 主任护师,护理部主任。E-mail:sdyanglijuan@aliyun.com
  • 作者简介:尚苗苗(1981-),女,山东淄博人,硕士,主管护师,护士长。
  • 基金资助:
    山东省立医院循证护理项目(SDSLEBN-2019-10)

Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines Related to Tracheotomy Care of Adult Patients

SHANG Miao-miaoa, WANG Li-yuanb, ZHANG Zhen-meib, YAN Bing-pinga, LIU Lia, YANG Li-juanb   

  1. a. Dept. of Neurological Surgery; b. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Shangdong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China
  • Received:2020-11-05 Online:2021-03-10 Published:2021-04-08

摘要: 目的 对国内外成人患者气管切开护理相关临床实践指南进行质量评价和内容分析,为临床进行基于证据的气管切开护理实践和构建适合我国本土的成人患者气管切开管理临床实践指南提供参考。方法 系统检索专业指南网、相关学会网站及数据库发布的成人患者气管切开护理相关指南,应用标准质量评价工具AGREEⅡ对纳入的循证指南进行质量评价,采用澳大利亚JBI循证卫生保健中心专家共识评价标准对基于专家共识的指南进行评价,并汇总指南中气管切开护理相关内容。结果 共纳入13篇指南,其中循证指南6篇,基于专家共识7篇。6篇循证指南的质量评价均为B级。7篇专家共识指南总体评价结果均为“纳入”。从13篇指南中共提取16个方面有关气管切开护理内容。结论 现有人工气道临床实践指南可以用于指导临床实践,但是不能为气管切开护理提供足够科学的参考依据,缺乏高质量的原始研究。结合我国实际情况,积极开展气管切开护理相关原始研究。

关键词: 人工气道, 气管切开, 实践指南, 质量评价, 内容分析

Abstract: Objective To conduct quality assessment and content analysis of clinical practice guidelines related to tracheotomy care of adult patients, and to provide references for evidence-based tracheotomy nursing and develop clinical practice guidelines for Chinese patients. Methods Systematic research of guidelines for tracheotomy care for adult patients from international guideline websites, websites of academic societies or institutions,and electronic databases was conducted. The quality of the literatures were evaluated according to AGREE II and JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Text and Opinion Papers in Australia. Results A total of 13 clinical practice guidelines were included, 6 of which were evidence-based while the other 7 were expert consensus. The 6 evidence-based guidelines were rated according to AGREE II as B and all 7 expert consensus guidelines were rated as included.Sixteen items pertaining to tracheotomy nursing were finally identified. Conclusion The existing clinical practice guidelines can be used in clinical practice, but can't provide enough scientific reference for tracheotomy nursing, and there is inadequate high-quality original research. The original research on tracheotomy nursing should be carried out according to the actual situation of our country.

Key words: artificial airway, tracheotomy, practice guide, quality appraisal, content analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] Freeman BD,Kennedy C, Coopersmith CM, et al.Examination of Nonclinical Factors Affecting Tracheotomy Practice in an Academic Surgical Intensive Care Unit[J].Crit Care Med,2009,37(12):3070-3078. DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181bc7b96.
[2] Leyn PD, Bedert L, Delcroix M, et al.Tracheotomy: Clinical Review and Guidelines[J].Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2007,32(3):412-421. DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.05.018.
[3] Lagambina S, Nuccio P, Weinhouse GL.Tracheotomy Care: A Clinician's Guide[J].HospPract,2011, 39(3):161-167. DOI:10.3810/hp.2011.08.591.
[4] Cipriano A, Mao ML, Hon HH, et al.An Overview of Complications Associated with Open and Percutaneous Tracheotomy Procedures[J].Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci, 2015, 5(3):179-188. DOI:10.4103/2229-5151.164994.
[5] 胡均贤,赵德英,袁玉明,等.神经外科患者经皮气管切开术与传统气管切开术两种术式并发症的对比分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2018,24(3):284-287. DOI:10.11798/j.issn.1007-1520.201803020.
[6] The NationalTracheotomySafety Project.Comprehensive Tracheotomy care[EB/OL].(2014-04-01)[2020-03-01]. http://www.tracheostomy.org.uk/resources/documents.
[7] Trouillet JL, Collange O, Belafia F, et al.Tracheotomy in the Intensive Care Unit: Guidelines from a Frenchexpert Panel[J].AnaesthCrit Care Pain Med, 2018,37(3):281-294. DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2018.02.012.
[8] De Leyn P, Bedert L, Delcroix M, et al.Tracheotomy: Clinical Review and Guidelines[J].Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2007,32(3):412-421. DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.05.018.
[9] 周芬,郝玉芳,丛雪,姚晓梅.指南研究与评价工具AGREE Ⅱ及各领域分值的补充解释及思考[J].护理学报,2018,25(18):56-58. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.18.056.
[10] 胡雁.循证护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.
[11] 《药学与临床研究》编辑部.如何正确运用组内相关系数进行一致性检验——药物研究中的统计学(一)[J].药学与临床研究,2018,26(1):7-8.
[12] Intensive care Society.Standards for the Care of Adult Patients with a Temporary Tracheotomy[EB/OL].(2018-07-01)[2020-03-01]. http://www.ics.ac.uk/ICS/GuidelinesAndStandards/ICSGuidelines.aspx.
[13] NHS.Tracheotomy Care Guidelines[EB/OL].(2017-10-01)[2020-03-01]. https: //www.southernhealth.nhs.uk/_resources/assets/attachment/full/0/153927.pdf.
[14] American Association for Respiratory Care.AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines.Endotracheal Suctioning of Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Artificial Airways 2010[J].Respir Care, 2010, 55(6):758-64.
[15] American Association for Respiratory Care.Humidification during Invasive and Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation: 2012[J].Respir Care, 2012, 57(5):782-788. DOI:10.4187/respcare.01766.
[16] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会呼吸治疗学组.成人气道分泌物的吸引专家共识(草案)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2014,37(11):809-811. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2014.11.004.
[17] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会呼吸治疗学组.人工气道气囊的管理专家共识(草案)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2014,37(11):816-819. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2014.11.006.
[18] 中华护理学会.中华护理学会关于发布《成人癌性疼痛护理》等9项目护理团体标准的公告[EB/OL].(2020-01-03)[2020-03-01]. http://www.zhhlxh.org.cn/cnaWebcn/upFilesCenter/upload/file/20200103/1578035246541045576.pdf.
[19] Sommer DD, Engels PT, Weitzel EK, et al.Recommendations from the CSO-HNS Taskforce on Performance of Tracheotomy during the COVID-19 Pandemic[J].J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2020,49(1):23. DOI:10.1186/s40463-020-00414-9.
[20] American Academy of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery.Tracheotomy Recommendations During the COVID-19 Pandemic[EB/OL].(2020-05-27)[2020-07-01]. https://www.entnet.org/content/tracheotomy-recommendations-during-covid-19-pandemic.
[21] The Michigan Critical Care Collaborative Network.Michigan Medicine Tracheostomy Guidelines in COVID-19 Era[EB/OL].(2020-04-01)[2020-07-01]. http://www.med.umich.edu/surgery/mcccn/documents/MM-Guidelines-for-Tracheostomy-in-COVID19-era.pdf.
[22] Ear,Nose and Throat Surgery in the United Kingdom(ENT-UK).Guidance for Surgical Tracheostomy and Tracheostomy Tube Change during the COVID-19 Pandemic[EB/OL].(2020-03-19)[2020-07-01]. https://www.entuk.org/tracheostomy-guidance-during-covid-19-pandemic.
[1] 蔡莹莹, 凌晨, 刘绵珠, 周杰, 张俊峰, 陈连华, 田潇飞, 罗斌, 陈梦云. 成人癌痛评估与管理指南的方法学质量评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 34-40.
[2] 刘硕怡, 熊莉娟, 李凌, 王玉梅, 何嘉, 李鑫, 袁淑蕾, 郭雪琴, 王暘婧, 张慧娟. 老年住院患者衰弱预防及管理临床实践指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[3] 陈丽燕, 任俊, 董辉, 陈慕莹, 罗伟香. 成人糖尿病患者低血糖管理的指南质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 41-47.
[4] 杨中善, 张丽华, 许妮娜, 詹昱新, 欧阳燕, 王羡科, 刘淼, 李鹏飞. 脊髓损伤神经源性肠道功能障碍相关指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(16): 44-49.
[5] 梁慧, 王建宁, 张艺, 胡娇娇, 龚翠颖, 李立群. 卧床患者压力性损伤管理指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(16): 50-55.
[6] 郭玉, 魏薇, 白冰, 李胜云. 以患者为中心的临床护理干预创新质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 7-11.
[7] 卜丝丝, 李玉红, 丁礼雪, 李文娟. 妊娠期女性身体活动指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 49-54.
[8] 冯小莹, 吴培香, 孙雪琪, 苑潇敏, 陈兰波. 冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者中西医结合康复护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(19): 1-6.
[9] 薛翠翠, 滕宏旭, 张荣, 刘华平, 田建丽. 我国优质护理资源下沉政策文本研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 20-23.
[10] 杨紫晗, 翟惠敏, 梁思静. 基于内容分析法的本科护理专业教师课程人文胜任力元素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(22): 1-5.
[11] 褚玲玲, 陈萍, 冯丹, 刘行, 冯永冬, 孙建国. 肿瘤相关静脉血栓栓塞症防治指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(16): 43-48.
[12] 杜玫洁, 张娜, 李咪琪, 黄素芳. 急危重症患者外周静脉通路建立相关指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(13): 39-45.
[13] 严玉娇, 丁娟, 刘晁含, 付沫, 王虹. 成人危重症患者气道管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(3): 39-45.
[14] 雷常彬, 刘珊珊, 蒋艳. 导管相关血流感染指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(23): 47-52.
[15] 狄恒丹, 陈璐, 王芳, 盛李昕贝. 镇静优化方案在颅脑损伤患者床旁经皮扩张气管切开术中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(21): 75-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!