以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (22): 26-31.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.22.026

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

母亲经历围产儿死亡事件体验的系统评价

唐文豪1, 李彦伶1, 孙鸿燕1, 任静1, 郑金龙2   

  1. 1.西南医科大学 护理学院,四川 泸州 646000;
    2.襄阳市中心医院 心胸外科,湖北 襄阳 441000
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-14 出版日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2020-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 孙鸿燕(1976-),女,四川泸州人,硕士学历,教授,护理学院党委书记。E-mail:598233545@qq.com
  • 作者简介:唐文豪(1994-),男,四川蓬溪人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护士。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅重大科技专项项目(2020YSFY0032)

Systematic Review of Maternal Experience of Perinatal Death

TANG Wen-hao1, LI Yan-ling1, SUN Hong-yan1, REN Jing1, ZHENG Jin-long2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing,Southwest Medical University,Luzhou 646000,China;
    2. Dept.of Cardiothoracic Surgery,Xiangyang Central Hospital,Xiangyang 441000,China
  • Received:2020-07-14 Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-12-15

摘要: 目的 系统评价母亲经历围产儿死亡事件的体验。方法 计算机检索中国知网、万方、VIP、PubMed、Web of Science、Medline、Wiley、EMbase数据库从建库至2020年3月有关母亲经历死产和围产儿死亡事件体验的质性研究,对文献进行质量评价后,采用Noblit和Hare's的Meta民族志方法对研究文献进行分析归纳。结果 纳入研究文献16篇。提炼出一个核心概念"母亲在痛苦的绝望中寻求新希望",基于以下4个主题,无声痛苦:母亲承受巨大的身心压力,负性情感突出;寻找出路:母亲通过应对策略抵御内心的痛苦;重建世界:母亲生活的改变与成长;未来曙光:母亲渴望得到尊重与照顾,对未来充满希冀。结论 医务人员应充分认识到围产儿的死亡不仅仅是医学问题,更是社会问题。应关注母亲心理变化,重视对母亲的情感支持,促进母亲生活重建。

关键词: 母亲, 围产儿死亡, 系统评价, Meta民族志

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the maternal experience of perinatal death.Methods Qualitative research on maternal experience of stillbirth and perinatal death events in CNKI,Wanfang database,VIP,PubMed,Web of Science,Medline,Wiley and EMbase database were searched by computer from the inception to March 2020.After quality evaluation of the literature,the meta-ethnography methods of Noblit and Hare's was used to analyze and summarize the literature.Results Sixteen articles were included.One core concept of seeking hope in painful despair is extracted based on the following four themes:prominent negative emotion demonstrated by silent pain and severe physical and mental pressure;coping strategies for inner torture;rebuilding the world:the change and growth of mother's life;future dawn:desire for respect and care and full of hope for the future.Conclusion Perinatal death is not only a medical issue,but also a social problem.Attaching importance to psychological changes of mothers,and providing emotional support for mothers will promote the reconstruction of mothers'life.

Key words: mother, perinatal death, systematic review, Meta-ethnography

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] Lawn JE,Blencowe H,Waiswa P,et al.Stillbirths:Rates,Risk Factors,and Acceleration towards 2030[J].Lancet,2016,387(10018):587-603.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00837-5.
[2] Heazell AE,Siassakos D,Blencowe H,et al.Stillbirths:Economic and Psychosocial Consequences[J].Lancet,2016,387(10018):604-616.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00836-3.
[3] Flenady V,Boyle F,Koopmans L,et al.Meeting the Needs of Parents after a Stillbirth or Neonatal Death[J].BJOG,2014,121(Suppl 4):137-140.DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.13009.
[4] 唐咏.癌症晚期患者丧亲者哀伤反应的质性研究[J].解放军护理杂志,2017,34(4):39-42.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2017.04.009.
[5] Cooke A,Smith D,Booth A.Beyond PICO:The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis[J].Qual Health Res,2012,22(10):1435-1443.DOI:10.1177/1049732312452938.
[6] Fox JR,Dean M,Whittlesea A.The Experience of Caring for or Living with an Individual with an Eating Disorder:A Meta-synthesis of Qualitative Studies[J].Clin Psychol Psychother,2017,24(1):103-125.DOI:10.1002/cpp.1984.
[7] France EF,Wells M,Lang H,et al.Why,When and How to Update a Meta-ethnography Qualitative Synthesis[J].Syst Rev,2016(5):44.DOI:10.1186/s13643-016-0218-4.
[8] Allahdadian M,Irajpour A,Kazemi A,et al.Strategy for Mental Health Improvement of Iranian Stillborn Mothers from Their Perspective:A Qualitative Study[J].Iran Red Crescent Med J,2016,18(1):e21081.DOI:10.5812/ircmj.21081.
[9] Hamama-Raz Y,Hartman H,Buchbinder E.Coping with Stillbirth Among Ultraorthodox Jewish Women[J].Qual Health Res,2014,24(7):923-932.DOI:10.1177/1049732314539568.
[10] Hsu MT,Tseng YF,Kuo LL.Transforming Loss:Taiwanese Women's Adaptation to Stillbirth[J].J Adv Nurs,2002,40(4):387-395.DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02386.x.
[11] Lee L,McKenzie-McHarg K,Horsch A.Women's Decision Making and Experience of Subsequent Pregnancy Following Stillbirth[J].J Midwifery Womens Health,2013,58(4):431-439.DOI:10.1111/jmwh.12011.
[12] Meyer AC,Opoku C,Gold KJ."They Say I Should not Think About It":A Qualitative Study Exploring the Experience of Infant Loss for Bereaved Mothers in Kumasi,Ghana[J].Omega,2018,77(3):267-279.DOI:10.1177/0030222816629165.
[13] Abdel Razeq NM,Al-Gamal E.Maternal Bereavement:Mothers'Lived Experience of Losing a Newborn Infant in Jordan[J].J Hosp Palliat Nurs,2018,20(2):137-145.DOI:10.1097/NJH.0000000000000417.
[14] Richards J,Graham R,Embleton ND,et al.Mothers'Perspectives on the Perinatal Loss of a Co-twin:A Qualitative Study[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2015,(15):143.DOI:10.1186/s12884-015-0579-z.
[15] Ryninks K,Roberts-Collins C,McKenzie-McHarg K,et al.Mothers'Experience of Their Contact with Their Stillborn Infant:An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2014(14):203.DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-14-203.
[16] Sereshti M,Nahidi F,Simbar M,et al.Mothers'Perception of Quality of Services from Health Centers after Perinatal Loss[J].Electronic physician,2016,8(2):2006-2017.DOI:10.19082/2006.
[17] Sutan R,Miskam HM.Psychosocial Impact of Perinatal Loss Among Muslim Women[J].BMC Women's Health,2012,12(1):15.DOI:10.1186/1472-6874-12-15.
[18] Waugh A,Kiemle G,Slade P.Understanding Mothers'Experiences of Positive Changes after Neonatal Death[J].Eur J Psychotraumatol,2018,9(1):1528124.DOI:10.1080/20008198.2018.1528124.
[19] Yamazaki A.Living with Stillborn Babies As Family Members:Japanese Women Who Experienced Intrauterine Fetal Death after 28 Weeks Gestation[J].Health Care Women Int,2010,31(10):921-937.DOI:10.1080/07399332.2010.503289.
[20] Tseng YF,Chen CH,Wang HH.Taiwanese Women's Process of Recovery from Stillbirth:A Qualitative Descriptive Study[J].Res Nurs Health,2014,37(3):219-228.DOI:10.1002/nur.21594.
[21] Testoni I,Bregoli J,Pompele S,et al.Social Support in Perinatal Grief and Mothers'Continuing Bonds:A Qualitive Study with Italian Mourners[J].J Women Soc Work,Epub 2020,DOI:10.1177/0886109920906784.
[22] Gaíva MAM,Palmeira EWM,Mufato LF.Women's Perception of Prenatal and Delivery Care in Cases of Neonatal Death[J].Escola Anna Nery,2017,21(4):e2017001.DOI:10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2017-0018.
[23] 董丽娟,胡慧红.围产儿死亡产妇创伤后成长体验的质性研究[J].全科护理,2018,16(17):2086-2089.DOI:10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2018.17.013.
[24] 秦如梦,周利华,陆彩云,等.癌症患者创伤后成长心理干预的研究进展[J].护理学报,2020,27(1):19-22.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.01.019.
[25] 李红,张晨,何莹,等.自我效能、人格特征对围产儿死亡妇女创伤后成长的影响[J].解放军护理杂志,2019,36(6):26-29.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2019.06.008.
[1] 伍丽华, 吴心雨, 赖湘瑜, 邓宝贵, 黄泽青, 赵耀, 廖源, 沈彩萍, 李瑜. 人工关节置换术后患者深静脉血栓风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 12-16.
[2] 李嘉琪, 莫文娟, 王一棋, 王洁, 李梦楠, 刘兴, 冯佳. 基于COSMIN方法对慢性疼痛患者恐动症坦帕评分表的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 56-62.
[3] 余璐, 黄晓沁, 刘琳, 袁嘉敏, 邬青. 心力衰竭患者30天非计划性再入院风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 43-48.
[4] 周越, 张杰, 潘宇帆, 戴雨, 孙羽健, 肖益, 余雨枫. 机械通气患者衰弱风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 56-61.
[5] 吴林梅, 梁志金, 刘瑞杰, 钟静静, 邱予骅. COPD患者运动康复促进和阻碍因素的系统评价-基于CFIR多层次理论[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 44-49.
[6] 王丽云, 张明慧, 张新月, 沙凯辉. 产后压力性尿失禁风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 57-62.
[7] 杨丽娜, 黄蓉, 姚梅琦, 王竹青, 徐怡婷, 谢佩敏. 产后母乳喂养行为中断风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 59-65.
[8] 章明阳, 刘京辉, 金雁, 徐文琪, 李斌飞, 黄珊, 杜李百合, 侯亚甜, 李小寒. 围手术期低体温风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 54-60.
[9] 张亦然, 王康美, 朱盛财, 朱璐, 黄沂. 中文版高血压患者自我管理评估工具的系统评价:基于COSMIN指南[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 52-57.
[10] . 轻度认知障碍向阿尔兹海默病进展风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(12): 47-53.
[11] 朱明月, 丁晓彤, 史纪元, 李峥. 自我感知老化对老年人认知功能影响的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 52-57.
[12] 叶磊, 张爱琴, 荣芸, 夏广惠. 老年髋部骨折患者术后谵妄风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 48-52.
[13] 杨楠楠, 蒋慧萍, 史婷奇. 基于机器学习构建住院患者深静脉血栓风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 44-49.
[14] 魏佳豪, 卜梦茹, 白子叶, 周瑾. 肺癌中医临床疗效评估工具测量学特性的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 56-62.
[15] 王窈, 管玉香, 郑静, 许娟, 王超. 持续血糖监测在糖尿病患者中应用的系统评价再评价[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(21): 39-45.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!