患者参与患者安全知信行质性研究的系统评价

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.10.036

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的系统评价患者参与患者安全知信行的质性研究,为促进患者参与患者安全管理决策提供依据。方法计算机检索PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库关于患者参与患者安全知信行的质性研究,检索时限从建库至2019年8月。采用2017版澳大利亚循证卫生保健中心质性研究评价标准（JBI-QARI）进行文献质量评价,采用汇集性整合方法对研究结果进行比较、分析、归纳、诠释和综合。结果共纳入12项研究,提炼出42个研究结果,综合成为3个整合结果和归纳形成8个新的类别：患者的认知态度、实践的障碍因素和患者的需求期望。结论医疗机构和医务人员应高度重视患者参与患者安全的组织管理和实践管理,从不同层面全方位地引导患者提高参与认知、增强参与信念及促进参与行动,从而保障患者安全和医疗安全。

关键词: 患者参与患者安全, 知信行, 质性研究, 系统评价

Abstract: Objective To conduct a systematic review of patients' knowledge-attitude-practice in participating in patient safety, and provide basis for promoting patients' participation in patients' safety management. Methods We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP Database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database for qualitative research on patients' knowledge-attitude-practice in participating in patients' safety. The retrieval time was from the inception of the database to August 2019. After evaluating the quality of literature using the Australian Evidence-based Health Care Center (JBI-QARI, 2017 edition) qualitative research quality evaluation criteria, meta-integration was carried out by using aggregative integration method, and the results were compared, analyzed, summarized, interpreted and synthesized. Results Twelve studies were included, and 42 results were extracted. Eight categories were summarized and integrated into three results including cognitive attitudes towards patients' participation, barriers to patients' participation, and expectations of patients' needs for participation. Conclusion Medical institutions and staffs should attach great importance to the organizational and practical management of patients' participation in patients' safety, and guide patients to improve their participation cognition, belief and action from different perspectives, so as to ensure patients' safety and medical safety.

Key words: patients' participation in patients' safety, knowledge-attitude-practice, qualitative research, systematic review

中图分类号:

詹昱新, 杨中善, 莫梦燕, 李素云, 喻姣花. 患者参与患者安全知信行质性研究的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(10): 36-42.

ZHAN Yu-xin, YANG Zhong-shan, MO Meng-yan, LI Su-yun, YU Jiao-hua. Qualitative Study on Knowledge-attitude-practice of Patients' Participation in Patients' Safety: A Systematic Review[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(10): 36-42.

参考文献

[1] Florin J,Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M.Patients’ and Nurses’ Perceptions of Nursing Problems in An Acute Care Setting[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2005,51(2):140-149.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03477.x.
[2] Pronovost PJ, Bo-Linn GW.Preventing Patient Harms Through Systems of Care[J]. JAMA, 2012, 308(8):769-770. DOI:10.1001/jama.2012.9537.
[3] World Health Organization. WHO Calls for Urgent Action to Reduce Patient Harm in Healthcare[EB/OL].(2019-09-13)[2020-03-18].https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/13-09-2019-who-calls-for-urgent-action-to-reduce-patient-harm-in-healthcare.
[4] World Health Organisation. Patients for Patient Safety Partnerships for Safer Health Care.[EB/OL].(2013-02-28)[2020-03-18].https://www.who.int/patientsafety/patients_for_patient/PFPS_brochure_2013.pdf?ua=1.
[5] Berger Z, Flickinger TE, Pfoh E, et. Promoting Engagement by Patients and Families to Reduce Adverse Events in Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review[J]. BMJ Qual Saf, 2014, 23(7):548-555. DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001769.
[6] 王雅星,徐蕊芳,关志,等. 痴呆患者参与决策及决策辅助的研究进展[J]. 护理学报,2019,26(13):38-43. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.13.038.
[7] 苑娜,刘春娥,于蕾,等. 外科手术患者参与手术决策的现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(4):47-50. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.04.047.
[8] Duhn L, Medves J.A 5-facet Framework to Describe Patient Engagement in Patient Safety[J]. Health Expect, 2018, 21(6):1122-1133. DOI:10.1111/hex.12815.
[9] 叶旭春,刘朝杰,刘晓虹. 患者对患者安全感知的质性研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2013, 19(25):3029-3032. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2013.25.002.
[10] Martin HM, Navne LE, ipczak H. Involvement of Patients with Cancer in Patient Safety: A Qualitative Study of Current Practices,Potentials and Barriers[J].BMJ Quality Safety,2013,22(10):836-842.DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001447.
[11] Rainey H, Ehrich K, Mackintosh N, et al.The role of Patients and Their Relatives in ‘Speaking Up’ about Their Own Safety-a Qualitative Study of Acute Illness[J]. Health Expectations, 2015, 18(3):392-405. DOI:10.1111/hex.12044.
[12] Bishop, Andrea C, Macdonald, et al. Patient Involvement in Patient Safety: A Qualitative Study of Nursing Staff and Patient Perceptions[J]. J Patient Saf, 2014(2):1-6. DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000123.
[13] 李宁,李艳鑫,杨柳. 心脏外科患者对参与患者安全管理认知的质性研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2015, 31(12): 874-877. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2015.12.005.
[14] 朱琴,颜巧元,张蓓蓓. 住院患者参与患者安全真实体验的质性研究[J]. 现代临床护理,2017,17(12):46-51. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2017.12.012.
[15] Burrows Walters C, Duthie E.Patients’ Perspectives of Engagement as a Safety Strategy[J]. Oncology Nursing Forum, 2017, 44(6):712-718. DOI:10.1188/17.ONF.712-718.
[16] Ringdal M, Chaboyer W, Ulin K, et al.Patient Preferences for Participation in Patient Care and Safety Activities in Hospitals[J]. BMC Nursing, 2017, 16(1):69-76.DOI:10.1186/s12912-017-0266-7.
[17] De Brún Aoife, Heavey E, Waring J, et al.PReSaFe: A Model of Barriers and Facilitators to Patients Providing Feedback on Experiences of Safety[J]. Health Expectations, 2017, 20:770-771. DOI:10.1111/hex.12516.
[18] 朱琴,颜巧元. 乳腺癌化疗患者参与患者安全感知的质性研究[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2018, 24(1):29-32.
[19] Schenk EC, Bryant RA, Van SCR, et al.Perspectives on Patient and Family Engagement With Reduction in Harm[J]. Journal of Nursing Care Quality,2018:1-7.DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000333.
[20] New L, Goodridge D, Kappel J, et al.“I Just Have to Take It”-patient safety in Acute Care: Perspectives and Experiences of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease[J]. BMC Health Services Research, 2019, 19:199-209.DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-4014-4.
[21] The Joanna Briggs Institute. Criticl Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research[EB/OL].(2019-05-28)[2019-09-18].https://joannabriggs.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI_Crit-ical_Appraisal-Checklist_for_Qualitative_Research2017_0.pdf.
[22] 王灿,蒋艳余. 临床护理用药管理及用药差错预防的研究进展[J].护理学报, 2017, 24(4):30-34.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.04.030.
[23] James JT.A New,Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care[J]. J Patient Saf, 2013, 9:122-128.DOI:10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948a69.
[24] 詹昱新,喻姣花,李凌志,等.医务人员对患者参与患者安全知信行质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(24):52-56. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.24.00.
[25] 朱琴,颜巧元. 患者参与患者安全标准化管理方案的研究现状及启示[J]. 中华护理杂志,2018, 53(7):127-130.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.07.027.
[26] 金环,喻姣花,李鑫,等. 护理不良事件人因可靠性数据库的设计与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(3):13-16. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.03.008.

相关文章 15

[1]	伍丽华, 吴心雨, 赖湘瑜, 邓宝贵, 黄泽青, 赵耀, 廖源, 沈彩萍, 李瑜. 人工关节置换术后患者深静脉血栓风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 12-16.
[2]	吴超瑜, 刘尚昆. 麻醉恢复室护士危机管理能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 17-21.
[3]	谭雯渲, 张容, 张立力, 王玮, 邵艳红, 方庆虹, 朱瑾. 心脏移植患者手术决策困境的现象学研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 69-73.
[4]	曹敏, 张培莉, 侯晓雅, 高超越, 郭林芳, 李滢. ABC-X模型下结直肠癌化疗患者照顾者营养照护体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 13-18.
[5]	李嘉琪, 莫文娟, 王一棋, 王洁, 李梦楠, 刘兴, 冯佳. 基于COSMIN方法对慢性疼痛患者恐动症坦帕评分表的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 56-62.
[6]	孙娟, 李亚莉, 马安娜, 王华, 张会敏. 护理研究生对社区护理实践思政教学体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 19-23.
[7]	王语, 赵慧杰, 肖梦伟, 范硕宁, 孙佳丽, 王珂心, 苏炫, 杨滢瑞. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者硅油填充期间疾病体验与应对的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 68-72.
[8]	冯春玲, 胡夏晴, 徐琳, 蔡鑫健, 徐琴鸿. 基于社会生态系统理论的电话指导公众实施心肺复苏行为动机及需求的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 66-71.
[9]	余璐, 黄晓沁, 刘琳, 袁嘉敏, 邬青. 心力衰竭患者30天非计划性再入院风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 43-48.
[10]	曹依丽, 王玲, 王灿, 陈燕华, 秦虹云. 精神分裂症住院患者家属资源取向的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 74-78.
[11]	马瑞瑞, 范晓莉, 徐姝娟, 张伟, 陈婷, 谈飞飞. 护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 6-11.
[12]	龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27-31.
[13]	张颖, 车晓艳, 万婠, 秦雪, 张恩思, 崇武, 郑淑娟. 我国性治疗护士工作范畴和核心能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 68-72.
[14]	张露心, 焦延超, 文稀, 田利, 王婷, 田凤美, 李惠玲. 护理本科生在“慕课西行”同步课堂学习体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 30-34.
[15]	周越, 张杰, 潘宇帆, 戴雨, 孙羽健, 肖益, 余雨枫. 机械通气患者衰弱风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 56-61.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared