以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 61-64.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.06.061

• 临床护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

多学科协作干预方案对维持性血液透析伴高磷血症患者血磷的影响

许世林a, 刘云a, 文罗娜b, 邹得娥a, 鲍敏锐a, 梁威锋a, 刘岩b   

  1. 暨南大学附属广州市红十字会医院 a.肾内科; b.临床病态营养研究所,广东 广州 510220
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-06 出版日期:2020-03-25 发布日期:2020-07-13
  • 通讯作者: 刘岩（1963-）,男,吉林公主岭人,博士,主任医师。
  • 作者简介:许世林（1988-）,男,广东湛江人,本科学历,主管护师。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目基金（2017B090904027）

Effect of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Intervention Program on Serum Phosphorus Levels in Patients with Hyperphosphatemia Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

XU Shi-lina, LIU Yuna, WEN Luo-nab, ZOU De-ea, BAO Min-ruia, LIANG Wei-fenga, LIU Yanb   

  1. a. Dept. of Nephrology; b. Institute of Disease-Oriented Nutritional Research, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510220, China
  • Received:2019-10-06 Online:2020-03-25 Published:2020-07-13

PDF (PC)

231

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨多学科协作干预方案对血液透析伴有高磷血症患者血磷的影响。方法 选取2019年3月在广州市红十字会医院血液净化中心行维持性血液透析并伴高磷血症的86例患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组（n=43）和观察组（n=43）。对照组予常规降磷方案及护理,观察组由本院血液净化中心、营养科和信息科组成的控磷小组进行协同治疗及护理,均干预3个月。干预前、干预3个月末比较2组患者血磷水平。结果 干预前,2组维持性血液透析并伴高磷血症患者血磷水平比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;干预 3个月末,观察组患者血磷水平低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 多学科协作干预方案对维持性血液透析伴有高磷血症患者血磷水平干预效果优于常规降磷方案及护理。

关键词: 维持性血液透析, 高磷血症, 多学科合作, 高磷食物库

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of multidisciplinary cooperative intervention on serum phosphorus in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients with hyperphosphatemia. Methods Eighty-six patients with hyperphosphatemia who underwent MHD in Guangzhou Red Cross hospital in March 2019 were recruited in the study and randomly divided into control group (n=43) and observation group (n=43). The control group received routine treatments for phosphorus reduction and nursing care, and the observation group nursing care and multidisciplinary collaborative intervention provided by hemodilaysis center, nutrition department and information department of our hospital. The intervention in the two groups lasted 3 months and data of serum phosphorus levels in the 2 groups were collected before and after the intervention. Results Before the intervention, there was no statistical significance in serum phosphorus levels between the 2 groups (P >0.05). At the end of 3 months, serum phosphorus level of the observation group was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of multi-disciplinary collaborative intervention program on serum phosphorus levels in MHD patients accompanied with hyperphosphatemia is better than that of routine treatment for phosphorus reduction and nursing care.

Key words: maintenance hemodialysis, hyperphosphatemia, multidisciplinary cooperation, high phosphorus food bank

中图分类号: 

  • R473.5
[1] 邵旭霞,张萍,姚曦,等.2008-2013年浙江省新增终末期肾脏病透析患者的人口统计学和原发病变迁[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2016,32(2):106-109. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-7097.2016.02.005.
[2] Kong X, Zhang L, Zhang L,et al.Mineral and Bone Disorder in Chinese Dialysis Patients: A Multicenter Study[J]. BMC Nephrol,2012(13):116. DOI:10.1186/1471-2369-13-116.
[3] Palmer SC, Hayen A, Macaskill P, et al.Serum Levels of Phosphorus, Parathyroid Hormone, and Calcium and Risks of Death and Cardiovascular Disease in Individuals with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J].JAMA.2011,305(11):1119-27. DOI:10.1001/jama.2011.308.
[4] 刘俊. 维持性血液透析患者的降磷治疗[J].实用医学杂志,2011, 27(22):3998-3999.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2011.22.003.
[5] Taylor C, Atkins L, Richardson A, et al.Measuring the Quality of MDT Working: An Observational Approach[J]. BMC Cancer, 2012, 12(1):20. DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-12-202.
[6] 刘晶晶,陈丽萍,陈正香,等.创伤骨科血栓防控的多学科合作管理实践[J].护理学报,2019, 26(13):30-33. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.13.030.
[7] 朱顺芳,刘霖,陈媛,等.基于微信多学科协作团队对稳定期COPD患者家庭自我管理干预研究[J].护理学报,2019,26(1):72-76. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.01.072.
[8] Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)CKD-MBD Update Work Group. KDIGO2017 Clinical Practice Guide-line Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-mineral and Bone Disorder(CKD-MBD)[J]. Kidney Int Suppl, 2017(7):1-59.DOI:10.1016/j.kisu.2017.10.001.
[9] 国家肾脏疾病临床医学研究中心.中国慢性肾脏病矿物质和骨异常诊治指南概要[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2019,28(1):52-57. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-298X.2019.01.012.
[10] Vrdoljak I, Panjkota KI, Bituh M,et al.Analysis of Different Thermal Processing Methods of Foodstuffs to Optimize Protein, Calcium, and Phosphorus Content for Dialysis Patients[J]. J Ren Nutr,2015, 25(3):308-315.DOI:10.1053/j.jrn.2014.11.1002.
[11] 杨月欣,王光亚,潘兴昌.中国食物成分表[M].2版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2009:30-77.
[12] Kara B,Caglar K,Kilic S.Nonadherence with Diet and Fluid Restrictions and Perceived Social Support in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis[J]. J Nurs Scholarsh,2007,39(3):243-248. DOI:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00175.x.
[13] Matsuzawa R, Kamitani T, Roshanravan B, et al.Decline in the Functional Status and Mortality in Patients on Hemodialysis:Results from the Japan Dialysis Outcome and Practice Patterns Study[J].J Ren Nutr,2019,29(6):504-510.DOI:10.1053/j.jrn.2018.10.012.
[14] Tsai WC, Yang JY,Luan CC,et al.Additional Benefit of Dietitian Involvement in Dialysis staffs-led Diet Education on uncontrolled Hyperphosphatemia in Hemodialysis Patients[J].Clin Exp Nephrol,2016,20(5) :815-821. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-015-1212-1.
[15] 朱金荣,张枫,张晓宇,等.血液透析患者钙磷代谢紊乱现状及影响因素分析[J].中国血液净化,2015,14(8):478-481. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2015.08.009.
[16] Ahrari S, Moshki M, Bahrami M.The Relationship between Social Support and Adherence of Dietary and Fluids Restrictions among Hemodialysis Patients in Iran[J]. J Caring Sci,2014,3(1):11-9. DOI:10.5681/jcs.2014.002.
[17] 任松,许明杰,孟祥龙.强化教育对维持性血液透析患者高磷血症影响的Meta分析[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2018,27(2):135-140. DOI:10.3969/cndt.j.issn.1006-298X.2018.02.007.
[1] 路景画, 陶惠琴, 张洁婷, 刘爱群, 陈景盈, 陈剑敏, 周宏珍. 306例维持性血液透析患者自体动静脉内瘘穿刺部位瘤样扩张现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(10): 59-63.
[2] 刘学, 李国新, 张广清, 李英娜, 刘婉珊, 肖娟. 220名维持性血液透析患者照顾者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 63-68.
[3] 何万巧, 盖薇, 周春兰, 张艺祯, 陶艳玲. 积极心理学视角下维持性血液透析患者生活质量现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 12-16.
[4] 刘雪琴, 刘晓辉, 平智广. 维持性血液透析患者营养不良风险列线图模型及在线计算器的构建与验证研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(16): 12-18.
[5] 张杰兰, 赖先婷, 余兆兰, 柯艾均, 徐铁飞, 鞠梅. 维持性血液透析患者配偶恐惧疾病进展的现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(7): 17-22.
[6] 陈丽富, 邓伟英, 徐敏玲, 张莉. 多学科合作安宁疗护在三级综合医院肿瘤临终患者中的实践[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(15): 56-59.
[7] 郑雯雯, 鲁春红, 吕桂兰, 王芳. 222例维持性血液透析患者的病耻感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(14): 44-48.
[8] 吴宗壁, 韩晓苇, 谭秋贞, 潘智鹍, 李瑾, 周华辉, 林珣, 姚东艳. 378例中青年维持性血液透析患者治疗依从性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(1): 47-51.
[9] 薛贵方, 张颖君, 瞿佳. 190例维持性血液透析患者灵性健康现状及影响因素的Ordinal Logistic回归分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(24): 32-35.
[10] 刘晶晶, 陈丽萍, 陈正香, 周媛苑, 王淑娟. 创伤骨科血栓防控的多学科合作管理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(13): 30-33.
[11] 杨冬菊,蒋晓莲. 83例维持性血液透析青中年患者自我感受负担与应对方式相关性分析与对策[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(3): 71-73.
[12] 董志娟,张海林. 维持性血液透析患者透析期运动的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(3): 28-33.
[13] 吕桂兰, 蔡芸, 黄丽璇, 王青尔, 景影, 朱玲. 115例维持性血液透析患者主要照顾者疲乏现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(22): 47-51.
[14] 罗香莲, 黄雅莲, 方艳春, 宋春莲, 朱婷, 徐俊敏. 团体爱笑瑜伽对维持性血液透析患者生活质量的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(22): 1-5.
[15] 杜兰玉, 胡霞, 王向弘, 刘海娜, 任磊, 朱晓秀, 段幼萍. 380例维持性血液透析患者衰弱现状及其对预后的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 37-41.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!