以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (15): 46-50.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.15.046

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

护士情域能力评价量表的编制及信度效度检验

吉加梅, 罗彩凤, 徐剑鸥   

  1. 江苏大学医学院 护理系,江苏 镇江 212000
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-22 发布日期:2020-07-08
  • 通讯作者: 罗彩凤（1965-）,女,江苏溧阳人,硕士,教授。
  • 作者简介:吉加梅（1993-）,女,江苏南通人,硕士,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目（2017SJB1079）; 江苏大学第十六批科研立项资助项目（16C581）; 江苏省教育科学“十二五”规划课题（B-b/2015/01/020）

Development of Nurse Affective Domain Ability Scale and Its Reliability and Validity

JI Jia-mei, LUO Cai-feng, XU Jian-ou   

  1. Dept. of Nursing, Medical College of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu 212000, China
  • Received:2019-03-22 Published:2020-07-08

PDF (PC)

793

赞

摘要： 目的 编制护士情域能力评价量表,检验其信度、效度,为评价护士情域能力提供有效工具。方法 以情感领域分类学为指导,结合文献查阅、小组讨论和2轮专家咨询形成初始评价量表。采用便利抽样法对镇江市3所三级甲等医院360名护士进行问卷调查,检验问卷信度、效度,形成正式量表。结果 共删除18个条目,保留25个条目：专业价值内化能力（7个条目）、专业价值评价能力（6个条目）、专业内涵领悟能力（7个条目）、专业信念感知能力（5个条目）。经探索性因子分析提取出4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为68.117%,验证性因子分析显示模型适配度良好。量表内容效度指数为0.928,各条目的内容效度指数为0.800~1.000;量表总Cronbach α系数为0.959,折半信度为0.897。结论 护士情域能力评价量表具有较好的信度及效度,可用于评价护士情域能力。

关键词: 护士, 情域能力评价量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To development nurse affective domain ability scale, and to test its reliability and validity, and to provide an effective tool for assessing nurses&' affective domain ability. Methods Guided by the five-level structure mode of affective domain ability, initial evaluation scale was formed after literature review, group discussion and two rounds of expert consultation. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 360 nurses in 3 tertiary grade A hospitals in Zhenjiang by convenience sampling to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire then a formal scale was developed. Results Totally 18 items were deleted in the initial version of the scale and the questionnaire was composed of 4 dimensions with 25 items: professional value internalization (7 items), professional evaluation capacity (6 items), connotation of professional ability (7 items), professional belief perception (5 items). Four factors were extracted and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 68.117% and confirmatory factor analysis revealed good fit of the model. The content validity was 0.928; the item content validity index ranged from 0.800 to 1.000 respectively and the Cronbach&'s alpha coefficient and split-half coefficient was 0.959 and 0.897 respectively. Conclusion With good reliablity and validity, the scale is a practical tool that can be used to evaluate the affective ability of nurses.

Key words: nurses, Affective Domain Ability Scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] Muzyk A J, Lentz K, Green C, et al.Emphasizing Bloom&'s Affective Domain to Reduce Pharmacy Students&' Stigmatizing Attitudes[J].Am J Pharm Educ,2017,81(2):1-7.DOI:10.5688/ajpe81235.
[2] 徐剑鸥,罗彩凤,唐文玲,等. 医学生情域能力培养路径探讨[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(17):34-36.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2018.17.015.
[3] 吉加梅,罗彩凤,徐剑鸥,等.基于情感教育目标护理情域能力的研究进展[J].现代临护理,2018,17(11):73-76.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2018.11.016.
[4] Pham J.A Student&'s Perspective on Assessment and the Affective Domain[J]. Am J Pharm Educ,2015,79(8):1-2.DOI:10.5688/ajpe798125.
[5] Miller C.Improving and Enhancing Performance in the Affective Domain of Nursing Students:Insights from the Literature for Clinical Educators[J].Contemp Nurse, 2010, 35(1):2-17.DOI:10.5172/conu.2010.35.1.002.
[6] Muzyk A J, Lentz K, Green C, et al.Emphasizing Bloom&'s Affective Domain to Reduce Pharmacy Students&' Stigmatizing Attitudes[J].Am J Pharm Educ,2017,81(2):1-7.DOI:10.5688/ajpe81235.
[7] Dunbar H,Carter B.A Sense of Belonging: The Importance of Fostering Student Nurses&' Affective Bonds[J].J Child Health Care,2017,21(4):367-369.DOI:10.1177/1367493517739977.
[8] Ward T D.Do You Hear What I Hear? The Impact of a Hearing Voices Simulation on Affective Domain Attributes in Nursing Students[J].Nurs Educ Perspect,2015,36(5):329-331.DOI:10.5480/14-1448.
[9] Russell-Kathleen K.Lessons Learned From a Theory of Planned Behavior-derived Study on Educational Interventions Inspired by the Affective Domain[J]. J Contin Educ Nurs, 2017, 48(12):543-551.DOI:10.3928/00220124-20171115-05.
[10] Karami A, Farokhzadian J, Foroughameri G.Nurses&' Professional Competency and Organizational Commitment: Is it Important for Human Resource Management?[J].PloS One,2017,12(11):1-15.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0187863.eCollection 2017.
[11] Isabell C, Banfield B, Lis G.Teaching to the Affective Domian:A End-of-life Simulation[J]. West J Nurs Res,2017,39(10):1371.DOI:10.1177/0193945917715261g.
[12] Yanofsky S D, Nyquist J G.Using the Affective Domain to Enhance Teaching of the ACGME Competencies in Anesthesiology Training[J].J Educ Perioper Med,2014,12(1):1-10.
[13] 罗丹. 炎症性肠病心理韧性量表的编制及信效度检验[D].南京:南京医科大学,2018.
[14] 潘靖菁,高钰琳,王惠珍,等.本科护生临床带教老师核心能力体系构建研究[J].护理学报, 2018,25(9):1-7.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.09.001.
[15] 刘于皛. 护士人文关怀测评工具的构建研究[D].上海:第二军医大学,2011.
[16] 李晓萍,沈翠珍.德尔菲法在护理研究中的应用现状[J].中华现代护理杂志,2012,18(22):2605-2607.DOI:10.3760/j.issn1674-2907.2012.22.001.
[17] 程晓娇,魏敏,陈芳.中文版决策冲突量表应用于面部整形美容咨询者的信效度研究[J].护理学报,2018,25(14):49-52.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.14.049.
[18] 王晓彤,卢天舒,李雪华,等.ICU护理人文关怀氛围评价量表的研制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志, 2018,53(11):1367-1371.DOI:10.3761/j.issn0254-1769.2018.11.018.
[19] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
[20] 王洁,郭燕.急性白血病患儿照顾者照护知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2019,26(6):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.06.001.
[21] 杨丽峰,杨洋,张春梅,等.老年人衰弱评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(1):49-53.DOI:10.3761/j.issn0254-1769.2017.01.010.
[22] Thompson B.Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications[M].Washington DC:American Psychological Assocation,2004.
[23] 侯明香,卢桂芝,王静波,等.护生安全注射知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2017,24(22):7-11.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.22.007.
[24] 鄢建军,杨建国,江燕,等.临床护理人员创新能力评价量表的构建及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志, 2018,53(10):1213-1217.DOI:10.3761/j.issn0254-1769.2018.10.011.
[25] 史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2011,37(2):152-155.DOI:10.3969/j.issn1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[26] 程玲灵,孙玉倩.癌症患者自我管理测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(9):1082-1087.DOI:10.3761/j.issn0254-1769.2017.09.014.
[27] 徐涓萍,郑洁,周春华.中文版4条目NASA任务负荷量表在ICU护士中的应用与信效度评价[J].护理学报,2018,25(22):55-58.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.22.055.
[1] 张玺, 黄静, 汪天华, 李燕, 曹沅, 李明惠, 余立平. 发育障碍儿童养育心理韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 6-11.
[2] 田美雨, 王翠玲, 高若男, 田佳, 刘怡. 妇科肿瘤科护士性健康照护培训方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 18-23.
[3] 彭琦, 吴婉英, 谢玲女. 造口伤口失禁专科护士培训中基于ADDIE模型案例教学的实践及效果评价[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 24-27.
[4] 吴超瑜, 刘尚昆. 麻醉恢复室护士危机管理能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 17-21.
[5] 郝瑞霞, 王秀梅, 蔚玲, 郭越, 张学. 磁性医院管理理念对手术室护士出勤主义行为的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 27-31.
[6] 李雪, 廖常菊, 张健, 丁娟, 陈晓丽, 胡玉庭. 三级甲等医院ICU护士睡眠障碍的风险预测模型构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 63-69.
[7] 李静依, 梁冠冕, 缪群芳, 赵月琰, 王晓宁, 钱萍萍. 临床护士死亡工作自我应对能力潜在剖面及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 13-18.
[8] 王子萱, 原振青, 赵一鋆, 王惠平, 洪菲菲, 邹敏. 体面劳动感在三级甲等医院手术室护士反思能力与创新行为的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 62-67.
[9] 徐晓东, 刘顺梅, 赵瑄, 丁秀娜. 显微根尖外科手术护士核心能力评价指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 69-73.
[10] 马瑞瑞, 范晓莉, 徐姝娟, 张伟, 陈婷, 谈飞飞. 护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 6-11.
[11] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[12] 龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27-31.
[13] 张颖, 车晓艳, 万婠, 秦雪, 张恩思, 崇武, 郑淑娟. 我国性治疗护士工作范畴和核心能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 68-72.
[14] 王静, 李萍, 王妍, 张琴, 侯铭, 王孜凡. 2 050名三级甲等医院护士组织公民行为现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 67-72.
[15] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!