以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (14): 6-12.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.14.006

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

2 888名老年人抑郁症状发展轨迹及影响因素研究

吴双赢, 谢子恒, 庄严   

  1. 南方医科大学 公共卫生学院生物统计学系,广东 广州 510515
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-22 出版日期:2024-07-25 发布日期:2024-08-05
  • 通讯作者: 庄严(1982-),女,广东广州人,博士,副教授。E-mail: zhuangy179@126.com
  • 作者简介:吴双赢(1999-),女,广东广州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81773544)

Development trajectory and influencing factors of depressive symptoms in 2,888 elderly individuals

WU Shuang-ying, XIE Zi-heng, ZHUANG Yan   

  1. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2024-02-22 Online:2024-07-25 Published:2024-08-05

摘要: 目的 对我国老年人抑郁症状变化趋势进行建模,并纳入新冠肺炎疫情相关变量,多维度研究其影响因素,为老年人抑郁的防治提供思路。方法 基于2013—2020年中国健康与养老追踪调查数据库,采用组基轨迹模型拟合老年人抑郁症状发展趋势,将模型确定后的轨迹分类作为因变量,采用无序多分类Logistic回归分析影响因素。结果 拟合得到老年人抑郁症状发展轨迹为4条,即抑郁低风险组、抑郁中风险组、抑郁高风险组、抑郁组,分别占比11.77%、38.43%、37.92%、11.88%。无序多分类Logistic回归分析显示:(1)与男性、有配偶、教育程度大专以下、居住城镇、无躯体疼痛、ADL无受损、IADL无受损相比,农村(OR=1.64,95%CI:1.22~2.21)、有躯体疼痛(OR=1.84,95%CI:1.42~2.39)、IADL有受损(OR=2.01,95%CI:1.44~2.79)及疫情对老年人精神影响(OR=1.19,95%CI:1.09~1.31)是老年人抑郁中风险的影响因素;(2)受教育程度大专及以上(OR=0.55,95%CI:0.35~0.86)、城乡或镇乡结合区(OR=1.79,95%CI:1.07~3.00)、农村(OR=2.15,95%CI:1.55~2.98)、有躯体疼痛(OR=3.97,95%CI:2.97~5.31)、ADL有受损(OR=2.62,95%CI:1.78~3.84)、IADL有受损(OR=3.07,95%CI:2.19~4.29)、疫情对老年人精神影响(OR=1.36,95%CI:1.24~1.49)是老年人抑郁高风险的影响因素;(3)女性(OR=2.07,95%CI:1.43~3.01)、有配偶(OR=1.80,95%CI:1.19~2.72)、城乡或镇乡结合区(OR=2.26,95%CI:1.11~4.57、农村(OR=2.96,95%CI:1.85~4.75)、有躯体疼痛(OR=9.67,95%CI:5.37~17.43)、ADL有受损(OR=4.63,95%CI:2.96~7.23)、IADL有受损(OR=8.03,95%CI:5.20~12.40)、疫情对老年人精神影响(OR=1.46,95%CI:1.32~1.62)是老年人抑郁的影响因素。结论 受新冠肺炎疫情影响,老年人抑郁发展轨迹占比特征发生变化,抑郁高风险及抑郁的占比增加。同时,性别、婚姻状况、受教育程度、居住类型、近2年躯体疼痛史、ADL、IADL、疫情对老年人精神影响为抑郁发展轨迹的影响因素。

关键词: 老年人, 抑郁, 发展轨迹, 新冠肺炎疫情, 老年护理

Abstract: Objective To model the trend of depressive symptoms in the elderly population in China and explore the multidimensional influencing factors, including variables related to the COVID-19 pandemic, to provide insights for the prevention and treatment of depression in the elderly. Methods Based on The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study database (2013-2020), group-based trajectory modeling was used to fit the development trajectory of depressive symptoms in the elderly. The trajectory classification determined by the model was used as the dependent variable, and unordered multinomial logistic regression was conducted to analyze the influencing factors. Results Four trajectories of depressive symptom development were identified: the low-risk group, the moderate-risk group, the high-risk group, and the depressive group, accounting for 11.77%, 38.43%, 37.92%, and 11.88% of the sample, respectively. Unordered multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that (1) compared to males, those having a spouse, or with an educational background of college degree or below, living in urban areas, without physical pain, without impaired activities of daily living (ADL), and without impaired instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), individuals living in rural areas (OR=1.64, 95%CI: 1.22~2.21), experiencing physical pain (OR=1.84, 95%CI: 1.42~2.39), having IADL (OR=2.01, 95%CI: 1.44~2.79), and being affected by the pandemic (OR=1.19, 95%CI: 1.09~1.31) were associated with a moderate risk of depression in the elderly; (2) having an education background of college degree or above (OR=0.55, 95%CI: 0.35~0.86), living in urban or semi-urban areas (OR=1.79, 95%CI: 1.07~3.00), living in rural areas (OR=2.15, 95%CI: 1.55~2.98), experiencing physical pain (OR=3.97, 95%CI: 2.97~5.31), having impaired ADL (OR=2.62, 95%CI: 1.78~3.84), having impaired IADL (OR=3.07, 95%CI: 2.19~4.29), and being affected by the pandemic (OR=1.36, 95%CI: 1.24~1.49) were factors associated with a high risk of depression in the elderly; (3) being female (OR=2.07, 95%CI: 1.43~3.01), having a spouse (OR=1.80, 95%CI: 1.19~2.72), living in urban or semi-urban areas (OR=2.26, 95%CI: 1.11~4.57), living in rural areas (OR=2.96, 95%CI: 1.85~4.75), experiencing physical pain(OR=9.67, 95%CI: 5.37~17.43), having impaired ADL (OR=4.63, 95%CI: 2.96~7.23), having impaired IADL (OR=8.03, 95%CI: 5.20~12.40), and being affected by the pandemic (OR=1.46, 95%CI:1.32~1.62) were factors associated with depression in the elderly. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the proportion of different trajectories of depressive symptoms in the elderly, with an increase in the proportion of high-risk and depressive trajectories. Sex, marital status, education background, living arrangement, recent history (last 2 years) of physical pain, ADL, IADL, and the pandemic's impact on the mental health of the elderly are identified as influencing factors for the trajectory of depressive symptoms.

Key words: elderly individual, depression, development trajectory, COVID-19 pandemic, geriatric care

中图分类号: 

  • R395.4
[1] 閤承治. 后疫情时代老年高血压患者焦虑抑郁状态与睡眠质量相关情况分析[D].武汉:江汉大学,2023.DOI:10.27800/d.cnki.gjhdx.2023.000443.
[2] Yaohui Z, Yisong H, Smith JP,et al.Cohort profile: the China health and retire-ment longitudinal study (CHARLS)[J].Int J Epidemiol,2014,43(1):61-68.DOI:10.1093/ije/dys203.
[3] Zhao YH, Strauss J, Yang GH, et al.China health and retirement longitudinal study:2011-2012 national baseline users' guide[S]. Beijing: National School of Development, Peking University, 2013.
[4] Thierno MO.Statistical power of latent growth curve models to detect quadratic growth[J]. Behav Res Methods,2014,46(2):357-371.DOI:10.3758/s13428-013-0395-1.
[5] Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB,et al.Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D(center for epidemiologic studies depression scale)[J].Am J Prevent Med,1994,10(2):77-84.DOI:10.1002/ajim.4700250315.
[6] Beatriz B, Pedro M Sánchez-Jurado,Marta Martínez-Reig,et al.Frailty,Poly-pharmacy,and health outcomes in older adults: the frailty and dependence in albacete study[J]. J Am Med Direct Assoc, 2017, 19(1):46-52.DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.07.008.
[7] Xiang X, An R, Heinemann A.Depression and unmet needs for assistance with daily activities among community-dwelling older adults[J]. Gerontol, 2018,58(3):428-437.DOI:10.1093/geront/gnw262.
[8] 中国健康与养老追踪调查.用户手册[EB/OL].[2024-05-20].https://charls.charlsdata.com/Public/ashelf/public/uploads/document/2020-charls-wave5/application/CHARLS_2020_User_Guide_Chinese.pdf.
[9] 胡晓茜,高奇隆,赵灿,等.中国高龄老人失能发展轨迹及死亡轨迹[J].人口研究, 2019(5):11.
[10] 胡依,闵淑慧,郭芮绮,等.基于组基轨迹建模的中国老年人抑郁症状发展轨迹研究[J].现代预防医学, 2022(4):695-699.
[11] 黄立群,李华,陈焕琴,等.我国老年人抑郁情绪的异质性轨迹——基于CHARLS数据[J].浙江医学教育,2019,18(4):38-40.
[12] 黄立群,陈凌玉,高小芬,等.我国老年人抑郁轨迹及其预测因素[J].护理研究,2023, 37(14):2525-2528.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.14.008.
[13] 范榕,李昱.新冠肺炎疫情背景下社区老年人健康素养水平调查[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2021,21(52):271-272.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3141. 2021.52.106.
[14] 吴蓓. COVID-19疫情背景下老年人的社会隔离与孤独—全球新挑战[J]. 医学新知,2021,31(1):2-4. DOI:10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.2021.01.01.
[15] 王越,陈晴,刘鲁蓉.中国老年人抑郁检出率及影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023,26(34):4329-4335.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0269.
[16] 刘梦焦,霍玉霞,王敬华,等.天津市滨海新区老年女性焦虑抑郁的患病情况及影响因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健, 2022(7):37.DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2022.07. 037.
[17] 郭丽阳,刘妮,陈策,等.中国社区中老年人群抑郁症状与冠心病风险的相关性研究:基于CHARLS数据库的实证分析[J].西安交通大学学报:医学版, 2023,44(1): 5.DOI:10.7652/jdyxb202301011.
[18] 任燕,陈善萍,杨永学.新冠肺炎流行期间居家老人抑郁现状及影响因素分析[J].现代临床医学, 2020,46(6):449-452.DOI:10. 11851 /j. issn. 1673-1557. 2020. 06. 018.
[1] 李疆伟, 王树君, 李长仔, 胡宝山, 焦桂梅, 张卫红. 基于压力应对理论的护理干预对结直肠癌术后永久性肠造口患者心理压力、负性情绪及自我管理的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 64-69.
[2] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[3] 陈玉英, 王海彦, 陈思颖, 杨雪娟. 老年人自立支援照护模式的照护技巧及启示[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 31-36.
[4] 谭丘羽, 邓一芯, 冀婉倩, 王冬华. 农村老年人自我刻板化与主观记忆抱怨在自我感知老化与痴呆恐惧间的链式中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 56-61.
[5] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[6] 王薇, 周演铃, 薛文萍, 张淋淋, 林书球. 老年髋部骨折患者衰弱评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 42-47.
[7] 肖霄, 张煊丽, 张云漪, 谢梓洋. 代际共同养育关系对0~3岁婴幼儿母亲抑郁的影响机制研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(24): 57-63.
[8] 邓岚心, 张宇, 李敏锐, 高钰琳. 养老机构老年人认知功能与身体衰弱变化的交叉滞后分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(23): 8-12.
[9] 牟晓玲, 陈宇琦, 刘海燕, 李敏, 董敏, 黄佳佳, 李璇, 陈瑜. 肺移植受者术后抑郁调查及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(21): 7-11.
[10] 李明哲, 田一川, 王成龙, 王晶晶. 社会网络在智能手机使用与老年人孤独感的因果中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 45-49.
[11] 王之仪, 颜立春, 胡雅静, 易小聪, 谭素文, 张银华. 养老机构老年人身体约束护理方案的构建与检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 55-59.
[12] 祁丽萍, 王文煊, 侯敏, 郑粤豪, 冯惠霞, 李济宾. 首诊鼻咽癌患者焦虑抑郁现状及其与恐惧疾病进展的关系[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 67-72.
[13] 袁佳琳, 杨玲玲, 刘晓慧, 甘茹, 杜瑄, 高海花, 杨小萍, 王慧娟. 308名脑卒中患者主要照顾者抑郁现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 27-31.
[14] 郝杨, 秦艳梅, 毛美琦, 赵雅宁, 刘瑶, 韩影. 基于贝叶斯网络模型的社区老年人认知衰弱的影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(19): 12-18.
[15] 杨侠, 于卫华, 张雨溪, 邓曼, 任影, 张利, 张海燕. 377例社区老年多重慢病患者心理困扰现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 50-55.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!