以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (15): 7-11.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.15.007

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年肺癌患者衰弱现状及影响因素分析

陈菲菲a, 庞永慧b, 茅乃权a, 罗洁宁a, 蔡道玲a   

  1. 广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院 a.胸瘤外科; b.护理专家督导组,广西 南宁 530021
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-13 出版日期:2020-08-10 发布日期:2020-09-11
  • 通讯作者: 庞永慧（1964-）,女,广西合浦人,本科学历,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail: pangyonghui001@163.com
  • 作者简介:陈菲菲（1988-）,女,四川达州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    广西壮族自治区卫生和计划生育委员会立项科研课题（Z20180620）; 广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会立项科研课题（Z20190474）

Frailty of Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer and Its influence Factors

CHEN Fei-feia, PANG Yong-huib, MAO Nai-quana, LUO Jie-ninga, CAI Dao-linga   

  1. a. Thoracic Surgery;
    b. Nursing Expert Supervision Group, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China
  • Received:2020-02-13 Online:2020-08-10 Published:2020-09-11

PDF (PC)

591

赞

摘要： 目的 调查老年肺癌住院患者衰弱的发生现状并分析其影响因素。方法 采用方便抽样法,选取广西某三级甲等肿瘤医院胸瘤外科146例60岁及以上的肺癌患者,应用一般资料调查表、中文版格列宁根衰弱指标量表、中文版Barthel指数进行问卷调查,采用多元线性回归分析老年肺癌患者衰弱的影响因素。结果 在老年肺癌住院患者中,衰弱患者占36.3%,衰弱总分为（3.01±1.58）分,其中躯体衰弱（1.27±0.90）分,认知衰弱（0.58±0.49）分,社交衰弱（0.52±0.50）分,心理衰弱（0.65±0.49）分。多元线性回归分析结果显示：年龄、肺癌分期、疾病病程、合并多病、日常生活能力对老年肺癌患者衰弱得分影响有统计学意义（P<0.001）,5个因素共解释总变异的50.4%。结论 老年肺癌患者在躯体、认知、社交、心理方面存在不同程度的衰弱状态,多种因素可影响其衰弱的发生,肿瘤专科医护人员应重视对该人群衰弱情况的评估,及时采取有效可行的干预措施,改善其生活质量,减轻医疗负担。

关键词: 老年人, 肺癌, 衰弱, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate the current status of frailty in elderly patients with lung cancer and analyze the influencing factors. Methods A total of 146 cases of lung cancer patients aged 60 and above in the department of thoracic oncology, a tertiary grade-A cancer hospital in Guangxi were selected by convenient sampling and were surveyed by using general information questionnaire, Chinese version of Groningen Frailty Index and Barthel index scale. The influencing factors were analyzed by multiple linear regression. Results The total score of frailty was 3.01±1.58, including physical frailty 1.27±0.90, cognitive frailty 0.58±0.49, social frailty 0.52±0.50, and mental frailty 0.65±0.49. Multiple linear regression showed that age, stage of lung cancer, course of disease, multiple diseases, and activities of daily living had statistically significant effects on frailty score of elderly lung cancer patients, which explained 50.4% of the total variance (P<0.001). Conclusion Elderly patients with lung cancer have different degrees of frailty in physical, cognitive, social and psychological aspects, and multiple factors can affect the occurrence of frailty. Tumor specialists should attach importance to the assessment of frailty in this population, and timely take effective and feasible intervention measures to improve their quality of life and reduce medical burden.

Key words: elderly, lung cancer, frailty, influencing factor

中图分类号: 

  • R473.73
[1] Ethun CG, Bilen MA, Jani AB, et al.Frailty and Cancer: Implications for Oncology Surgery Medical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2017, 67(5):362-377. DOI:10.3322/caac.21406.
[2] Handforth C, Clegg A, Young C, et al.The Prevalence and Outcomes of Frailty in Older Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review[J]. Ann Oncol.2015,26(6):1091-1101. DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdu540.
[3] Driessen EJM, Van Loon JGM, Maas HA, et al.Geriatric Assessment for Older Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Daily Practice of Centers Participating in the NVALT25-ELDAPT Trial[J].25-ELDAPT Trial[J]. Lung,2018,196(4):463-468. DOI:10.1007/s00408-018-0116-8.
[4] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.原发性肺癌诊疗规范(2018年版)[J].肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志,2019,5(3):100-120. DOI:10.12151/JMCM.2019.03-16.
[5] 李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.
[6] Peters LL, Boter H, Buskens E, et al.Measurement Properties of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in Home-dwelling and Institutionalized Elderly People[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2012,13(6):546-551. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2012.04.007.
[7] Baitar A, Van Fraeyenhove F, Vandebroek A, et al.Evaluation of the Groningen Frailty Indicator and the G8 Questionnaire as Screening Tools for Frailty in Older Patients with Cancer[J]. J Geriatr Oncol, 2013, 4(1):32-38.DOI:10.1016/j. jgo.2012.08.001.
[8] Xiang W, Cheng Y, Li Z, et al.Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in Chinese Nursing Home Residents[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2020,32(6):1035-1042. DOI:10.1007/s40520-019-01178-7.
[9] 相玮. 格列宁根衰弱指标量表的信效度分析及应用[D].吉林:吉林大学,2019.
[10] 蔡业峰,贾真,李伟峰,等.中文版Barthel指数对多中心测评缺血性卒中患者预后的研究[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2007,4(11):486-490.
[11] Wang Y, Zhang R, Shen Y, et al.Prediction of Chemotherapy Adverse Reactions and Mortality in Older Patients with Primary Lung Cancer Through Frailty Index Based on Routine Laboratory Data[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2019, 14(5):1187-1197. DOI:10.2147/CIA.S201873.
[12] Lu J, Cao LL, Zheng CH, et al.The Preoperative Frailty Versus Inflammation-based Prognostic Score:Which is Better as an Objective Predictor for Gastric Cancer Patients 80 Years and Older?[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(3):754-762. DOI:10.1245/s10434-016-5656-7.
[13] 张艳,梁亚萍,孙铭薇,等.老年人衰弱的影响因素分析[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2019,23(2):140-145. DOI:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2019.02.004.
[14] 曾朝霞,梁杰.老年冠心病患者合并衰弱综合征的影响因素研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(19):2347-2352. DOI:10. 3969/j.issn.1007-9572. 2017. 19. 011.
[15] Gill TM, Gahbauer EA, Han L, et al.The Relationship between Intervening Hospitalizations and Transitions between Frailty States[J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2011,66(11):1238-1243. DOI:10.1093/gerona/glr142.
[16] 杨继平,石泽亚,周毅峰,等.老年衰弱患者术前评估管理证据汇总[J].护理学报,2019,26(7):34-39. DOI:10.16460/j. issn1008-9969.2019.07.034.
[17] 张国龙,李映红,翁慧雯.老年肺癌化疗患者衰弱情况及影响因素分析[J].现代医院,2018,18(12):1773-1775. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-332X.2018.12.017.
[18] 施亮,王增,俞婷婷,等.慢性病及其治疗药物可能会影响肺癌患者术后5年生存率(英文)[J].中国药学杂志,2017,26(2):147-155.DOI:10.5246/jcps.2017.02.014.
[19] Woo J, Zheng Z, Leung J, et al.Prevalence of Frailty and Contributory Factors in three Chinese Populations with Different Socioeconomic and Healthcare Characteristics[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2015, 15(1):163.DOI:10.1186/s12877-015-0160-7.
[20] Fried LP, Tan Gen CM, Walston J, et al.Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype[J]. J A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2001,56(3):M146-M156. DOI:10. 1093/Gerona
[21] 靳瑜,窦丽亚,马慧珍.抗阻力运动对老年2型糖尿病伴衰弱患者的应用效果[J].护理学报,2019,26(3):51-55. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn.1008-9969.2019.03.051.
[1] 李丹妮, 邱丽燕, 吴隆燕, 谭铮可可, 陈欣, 杨丽. 前交叉韧带损伤日间手术患者恐动症的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 12-17.
[2] 杜易梅, 刘莉, 郭立丽, 卢吉, 付苗苗, 刘杰. 妇科恶性肿瘤患者性健康研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 28-33.
[3] 李垚, 陈小敏, 夏敏, 吴茜, 张琳, 陈叡喆, 葛莉丽, 吴逸梅. 肿瘤患者衰弱评估工具应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(4): 48-52.
[4] 焦雪萍, 王志稳, 韩舒羽. ICU老年患者躁动行为的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 38-42.
[5] 李长娥, 徐真真, 张文忠, 吴燕, 季红. 新生儿父母脐带血储存决策影响因素的定性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(3): 74-78.
[6] 魏利, 赵兴颖, 刘佳, 何雨璇, 陈晓梅, 杨雪, 鲜继淑, 杨燕妮. 神经外科重症住院患者家庭照顾者照顾负担及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 1-6.
[7] 杨蓓, 叶红芳, 张宁, 相卢伟, 路诗雨. 老年2型糖尿病患者体力活动现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 7-12.
[8] 陈玉英, 王海彦, 陈思颖, 杨雪娟. 老年人自立支援照护模式的照护技巧及启示[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 31-36.
[9] 刘硕怡, 熊莉娟, 李凌, 王玉梅, 何嘉, 李鑫, 袁淑蕾, 郭雪琴, 王暘婧, 张慧娟. 老年住院患者衰弱预防及管理临床实践指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 50-55.
[10] 闫亚铃, 乐美妮, 姚桃琴, 王雪莲, 姜建玲, 辛艺. 老年胃肠肿瘤患者围手术期衰弱管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 74-78.
[11] 刘畅, 张维, 王翠雪, 岳鹏. ICU实施非限制性探视制度的影响因素研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 34-38.
[12] 王进波, 吴姗, 黄蓉蓉, 陈代凤, 洪梅, 李审绥. 头颈癌患者自杀影响因素及干预的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 39-43.
[13] 谭丘羽, 邓一芯, 冀婉倩, 王冬华. 农村老年人自我刻板化与主观记忆抱怨在自我感知老化与痴呆恐惧间的链式中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(1): 56-61.
[14] 陈莹莹, 丁红, 张根生. 患儿术后谵妄影响因素的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 32-35.
[15] 曹娟, 李方, 于跃, 戴丽, 杨丹丹, 李志华, 徐欣怡, 戴琪, 陈柯宇. 食管癌术后静脉血栓栓塞症风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 63-68.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!