以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 40-45.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.03.040

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

220例预防性肠造口患者病耻感现状及影响因素分析

叶子文1, 甄莉2, 朱木兰2, 胡婷1, 王惠珍1   

  1. 1.南方医科大学护理学院,广东 广州 510515;
    2.南方医科大学南方医院 普外科,广东 广州 510515
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-12 出版日期:2019-02-10 发布日期:2020-07-08
  • 通讯作者: 王惠珍(1954-),女,河北安国人,本科学历,教授,博士研究生导师。
  • 作者简介:叶子文(1993-),女,湖南澧县人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目(201709010035)

Stigma of Patients with Preventive Ostomy and Its Influence Factors: A 220-case Study

YE Zi-wen1, ZHWN Li2, ZHU Mu-lan2, HU Ting1, WANG Hui-zhen1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    2. Dept. of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2018-10-12 Online:2019-02-10 Published:2020-07-08

摘要: 目的 调查预防性肠造口患者的病耻感现状,分析其影响因素。方法 采用便利抽样法,选取某省4家三级甲等医院220例直肠癌预防性肠造口患者,采用一般资料调查问卷、社会影响量表、领悟社会支持量表、自我隐瞒量表、应对方式问卷进行调查。采用多元线性回归分析预防性肠造口患者病耻感的影响因素。结果 预防性肠造口患者病耻感得分为(60.62±7.28)分。多重线性回归分析结果显示,自我隐瞒、家庭所在地、社会支持水平、应对方式、造口对性生活的影响程度、有无造口并发症进入回归方程(P<0.001),可解释预防性肠造口患者病耻感总变异的75.0%。结论 预防性肠造口患者病耻感得分处于中等水平。减轻患者自我隐瞒倾向,给予患者良好的社会支持、帮助患者正确应对疾病,对降低其病耻感程度起着重要作用。此外,针对有性生活需求的患者,应主动对其进行性健康教育;针对居住在农村的患者,应注意采用多种健康教育形式和随访途径。为减少造口并发症的发生,应切实教会患者如何进行造口护理操作,并指导患者对造口进行动态监测,做到早发现、早处理。

关键词: 预防性肠造口, 病耻感, 自我隐瞒, 社会支持, 应对方式

Abstract: Objective To describe the current status of stigma in patients with preventive ostomy and analyze its influence factors. Methods By convenience sampling method, 220 colorectal cancer patients with temporary ostomy in 4 tertiary grade A hospitals participated in the study and they were surveyed by using general information questionnaire, Social Impact Scale(SIS), Perceived Social Support Scale(PSSS), Self-Concealment Scale(SCS) and Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire(MCMQ). Multiple linear regression analysis was carried out for the influence factor of stigma. Results The total score of SIS was 60.62±7.28. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that stigma was affected by self-concealment, house location, social support, coping style, influence degree of stigma on sexual life and ostomy complications(P<0.001), which could explain 75.0% of the variation. Conclusion Stigma in patients with preventive ostomy is in a mediate level. Alleviating patients' self-concealment tendency, giving them enough social support and helping them cope with the disease correctly can reduce patients' stigma. Sexual health education should be given to patients with sexual needs. For patients living in rural areas, multiple forms of healthy education and follow-up should be provided. Practical ostomy nursing skills and dynamic monitoring of ostomy are beneficial to reducing the incidence of ostomy complications,.

Key words: preventive ostomy, stigma, self-concealment, social support, coping style

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] Du L B, Li H Z, Wang Y Q, et al.Report of Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in China, 2013[J]. Zhong Hua Zhong Liu Za Zhi,2017,39(9):701-706.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.
[2] Arnold M, Sierra M S, Laversanne M, et al.Global Patterns and Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality[J]. Gut,2017,66(4):683-691. DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912.
[3] 汪建平. 低位直肠癌术式选择及评价[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2017,37(6):593-595.DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.
[4] Goffman E.Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity[M]. New York: Simon and Schuster,1963.
[5] 中华人民共和国卫生和计划生育委员会医政医管局.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2015版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2015,14(6):783-799. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2015.10.001.
[6] Fife B L, Wright E R.The Dimensionality of Stigma: A Comparison of Its Impact on the Self of Persons with HIV/AIDS and Cancer[J]. J Health Soc Behav,2000,41(1):50-67. DOI:10.2307/2676360.
[7] Pan A W, Chung L, Fife B L, et al.Evaluation of the Psychometrics of the Social Impact Scale: A Measure of Stigmatization[J]. Int J Rehabil Res,2007,30(3):235-238.DOI:10.1097/MRR.0b013e32839fb3db.
[8] 原静民,郑美春,卜秀青,等.永久性肠造口患者病耻感现状及其影响因素研究[J].中华护理杂志,2016,51(12):1422-1427. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2016.12.003.
[9] Blumenthal J A, Burg M M, Barefoot J, et al.Social Support, Type a Behavior, and Coronary Artery Disease[J]. Psychosom Med, 1987, 49(4):331-340.DOI:10.1097/00006842-198707000-00002.
[10] 黄丽,姜乾金,任蔚红.应对方式、社会支持与癌症病人心身症状的相关性研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(4):160-161.
[11] Larson D G, Chastain R L.Self-concealment: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Health Implications[J]. J Soc Clin Psychol, 1990, 9(4):439-455. DOI:10.1521/jscp.1990.9.4.439.
[12] 王才康. 中学生自我隐瞒倾向:因素结构与发展特点[J]. 应用心理学, 2002, 8(2):15-17.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2002.02.003.
[13] 中国行为医学科学编辑委员会.行为医学量表手册[M]. 北京:中华医学电子音像出版社,2005.
[14] 沈晓红,姜乾金.医学应对方式问卷中文版701例测试报告[J]. 中国行为医学科学,2000,9(1):22-24. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2000.01.008.
[15] 康莉,郝楠.直肠癌永久性结肠造口病人病耻感及影响因素的调查[J].护理研究,2017,31(28):3527-3530. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.28.012.
[16] 徐芳芳,于卫华,王胜琴,等.直肠癌永久性肠造口患者病耻感及影响因素分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2017,23(1):34-38. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2017.01.009.
[17] 杜晓霞,区晓菊,朱琳,等.永久性结肠造口患者生活质量与自我护理能力及病耻感关系模型的研究[J]. 护理学报,2016,23(23):40-43. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.23.040.
[18] 王惠珍,秦芳,苏茜,等.不同类型肠造口者生存质量和自我效能的关系分析[J].实用医学杂志, 2015, 31(12):2049-2052. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2015.12.049.
[19] Smith D M, Loewenstein G, Jankovic A, et al.Happily Hopeless: Adaptation to a Permanent, but Not to a Temporary, Disability[J]. Health Psychology,2009,28(6):787-791. DOI:10.1037/a0016624.
[20] Danielsen A K, Soerensen E E, Burcharth K, et al.Impact of a Temporary Stoma on Patients' Everyday Lives: Feelings of Uncertainty While Waiting for Closure of the Stoma[J]. J Clin Nurs,2013,22(9/10):1343-1352. DOI:10.1111/jocn.12011.
[21] Mika O.Japanese College Students' Attitudes Toward Professional Psychological Services: The Role of Cultural Self-construal and Self-concealment[J]. Psychol Rep,2007,100(2):387-399. DOI:10.2466/PR0.100.2.387-399.
[22] 李欢. 高自我隐瞒倾向者对负面信息的注意偏向研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学,2012.DOI:10.7666/d.y2086635.
[23] 王婷,陈湘玉. 造口患者适应水平现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报,2015,22(1):1-4.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2015.01.001.
[24] Thomsen T G, Rydahl-Hansen S, Wagner L.A Review of Potential Factors Relevant to Coping in Patients with Advanced Cancer[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2010, 19(23/24):3410-3426.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03154.x.
[25] Reese J B, Finan P H, Haythornthwaite J A, et al.Gastrointestinal Ostomies and Sexual Outcomes: A Comparison of Colorectal Cancer Patients by Ostomy Status[J]. Support Care Cancer,2014,22(2):461-468.DOI:10.1007/s00520-013-1998-x.
[26] Leyk M, Ksiaz E J, Habel A, et al.The Influence of Social Support from the Family on Health Related-quality of Life in Persons with a Colostomy[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs,2014, 41(6):581-588.DOI:10.1097/WON.0000000000000086.
[27] FormijneJonkers H, Draaisma W A, Roskott A M, et al.Early Complications after Stoma Formation: A Prospective Cohort Study in 100 Patients with 1-year Follow-up[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis,2012,27(8):1095-1099.DOI:10.1007/s00384-012-1413-y.
[1] 林丽华, 盖薇, 王语璇, 尹丽丽, 吕郑晗, 陶艳玲. 自我同情在脑卒中患者社会支持与病耻感的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 15-19.
[2] 林育鹏, 张丽. 231例炎症性肠病复发患者挫败感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 18-21.
[3] 胡晓涵, 占婷婷, 何望生, 乔疏桐, 李雪. 肝豆状核变性患者自我管理体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 17-21.
[4] 吴茜, 蒋宇, 金梦杰, 范恩, 施莉, 王梅新. 321例青年初治肺结核患者社会疏离感现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 65-69.
[5] 张许婷, 罗彩凤, 魏兰芝, 邵校, 尚彬, 卞泽坤, 吕妃, 孙炜怡. 实习护生体面劳动感的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 12-16.
[6] 何洪, 王佳琳, 袁中清, 滕梅, 任黔黔, 蔚萌. 领悟社会支持在护士应急能力与心理负荷的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 63-67.
[7] 吴萍, 于宛辰, 柳嘉怡, 王汕珊, 胡燕. 糖尿病前期人群社会支持研究的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(21): 49-54.
[8] 梁琪, 王冰洁, 刘洋, 张春梅. 智谋在老年结直肠癌造口患者病耻感与社会隔离的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(14): 19-23.
[9] 何叶, 王元姣, 谢珺, 苗姣娜. 心理资本在恢复期脑卒中患者领悟社会支持与患者积极度的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 65-70.
[10] 陈琪, 朱波, 张青. 临床护士组织支持感和积极应对方式在主动性人格与创新行为间的链式中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(21): 1-6.
[11] 付利婷, 张兴海, 孙萱. 知觉压力和领悟社会支持在养老机构老年人感知年龄歧视与自杀意念间的中介效应研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 1-5.
[12] 付爽, 刘祯, 崔玉顺. 中青年首发脑卒中患者心理一致感在领悟社会支持与创伤后应激障碍的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 43-47.
[13] 刘祯帆, 严晓婷, 陈粹, 王芷彤. 希望水平与个人掌控感在甲状腺癌术后患者领悟社会支持与灵性健康的链式中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 57-62.
[14] 陈圆, 李嘉玲, 欧璐, 邹黄珏, 甘旻菲, 王卫红. 在读护理硕士研究生的职业结果预期在领悟社会支持和专业承诺的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(16): 7-11.
[15] 杨旭珍, 单岩, 王佳佳, 丁亚博, 刁渴珂, 黄艺嘉, 张延军. 应对效能在腹膜透析患者内在力量和应对方式的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(16): 63-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!