目的 探索中职护生心盛的潜在类别及其影响因素。方法 采用一般资料调查表、心盛量表及青少年心理弹性量表,于2023年5月选取南充市2所卫校的1 314名中职护生进行调查,通过潜在剖面分析识别心盛的潜在类别,采用多元logistic回归分析探讨其影响因素。结果 中职护生心盛可分为3个潜在类别：低心盛组（7.23%）、中等心盛组（54.64%）、高心盛组（38.13%）。多元logistic回归分析结果显示,不同心盛类别的中职护生在学习成绩、运动频率、家庭经济水平和心理弹性的分布上差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 中职护生心盛存在异质性,学习成绩越好、运动频率越高、家庭经济水平越高和心理弹性越好的中职护生更容易归入高心盛组。护理教育者可根据不同心盛类别中职护生的特征制定针对性的干预措施,尤其需重点关注低心盛组,以提高其心盛水平。
Abstract
Objective To explore the potential categories and influencing factors of flourishing in secondary vocational nursing students. Methods A total of 1 314 secondary vocational nursing students from two nursing schools in Nanchong city were investigated using the General Information Questionnaire, the Flourishing Scale and The Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescent in May 2023. Latent profile analysis was used to explore the potential categories of flourishing, and multiple logistic regression analysis to compare the characteristics of each potential categories. Results There were 3 potential categories of flourishing in secondary vocational nursing students including low level of flourishing (7.23%), medium level of flourishing (54.64%), and high level of flourishing (38.13%). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that three groups showed statistically significant differences in academic performance, exercise frequency, family economic status and resilience (P<0.05). Conclusion There is heterogeneity in the flourishing of the secondary vocational nursing students. The students with better academic performance, higher exercise frequency, better family economic status and better resilience were more likely to enter high level flourishing group. Nursing educators can formulate targeted interventions according to the characteristics of different types of vocational nursing students, especially the low level flourishing group, to improve their flourishing.
关键词
中职护生 /
幸福感 /
心盛 /
心理弹性 /
潜在剖面分析 /
积极心理学
Key words
secondary vocational nursing student /
well-being /
flourishing /
resilience /
latent profile analysis /
positive psychology
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 杨槐, 张灏, 龚少英. 主观社会经济地位对护理专业中职生主观幸福感的影响:多重中介模型[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021,29(3):608-613.DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2021.03.033.
[2] 高晶磊. 中职院校护理学生心理健康现状及其影响因素研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2019.
[3] 朱伟. 淮北市在校中职护生抑郁现况调查[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2019.
[4] 刘一人. 淮北市在校中职护生焦虑现况调查[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2019.
[5] 吴明玉. 积极心理学团辅对中职护生心理健康水平的促进作用[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2017.
[6] 段秀娟, 王志霞, 邓蓉, 等. 父母教养方式及应对方式对滇西北中职护生抑郁情绪的影响[J].成都医学院学报, 2023,18(1):128-131.10.3969/j.issn. DOI:1674-2257.2023.01.026.
[7] Waigel NC, Lemos VN.A systematic review of adolescent flourishing[J]. Eur J Psychol, 2023,19(1):79-99. DOI:10.5964/ejop.6831.
[8] 温忠麟, 谢晋艳, 王惠惠. 潜在类别模型的原理、步骤及程序[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023,41(1):1-15. DOI:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.01.001.
[9] 李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版, 2018.
[10] Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, et al.New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2010,97(2):143-156. DOI:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y.
[11] 赖巧珍. 大学生心盛状况及其在心理健康双因素模型中的应用研究[D]. 广州:南方医科大学, 2017.
[12] 胡月琴, 甘怡群. 青少年心理韧性量表的编制和效度验证[J]. 心理学报, 2008(8):902-912.
[13] Rodriguez-Ayllon M, Cadenas-Sánchez C, Estévez-López F, et al.Role of physical activity and sedentary behavior in the mental health of preschoolers, children and adolescents: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J].Sports Med, 2019,49(9):1383-1410. DOI:10.1007/s40279-019-01099-5.
[14] Chamizo-Nieto MT, Arrivillaga C, Rey L, et al.The role of emotional intelligence, the teacher-student relationship, and flourishing on academic performance in adolescents: a moderated mediation study[J].Front Psychol,2021,12:695067. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695067.
[15] Marciano L,Viswanath K.Social media use and adolescents’ well-being: a note on flourishing[J]. Front Psychol, 2023,14:1092109. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092109.
[16] Kim T, Jang CY, Kim M.Socioecological predictors on psychological flourishing in the US adolescence[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(21):7917. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17217917.
[17] Zhou J, Huo Y.Chinese youths’ physical activity and flourishing during COVID-19: the mediating role of meaning in life and self-efficacy[J]. Front Psychol, 2022,13:867599.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867599.
[18] Asquith SL, Wang X, Quintana DS, et al.The role of personality traits and leisure activities in predicting wellbeing in young people[J]. BMC Psychol, 2022,10(1):249. DOI:10.1186/s40359-022-00954-x.
[19] Reinhardt M, Horváth Z, Morgan A, et al.Well-being profiles in adolescence:psychometric properties and latent profile analysis of the mental health continuum model - a methodological study[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2020,18(1):95. DOI:10.1186/s12955-020-01332-0.
[20] Mcdermott RC, Fruh SM, Williams S, et al.Nursing students’ resilience, depression, well-being, and academic distress: testing a moderated mediation model[J]. J Adv Nurs,2020,76(12):3385-3397. DOI:10.1111/jan.14531.
[21] 刘凤, 张雨晨, 唐雅兮, 等. 心理韧性在本科护生欺凌行为与学业投入的调节效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023,30(10):58-62. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.10.058.
[22] 王莹滟, 郭成, 王亭月, 等. 家庭亲密度对中职生心理幸福感的影响:心理韧性与生命意义的作用[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2023,45(2):12-19. DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2023.02.002.
[23] 袁文萍, 黎雪琼, 马磊. 高职生积极心理品质与主观幸福感的关系:领悟社会支持和学校归属感的链式中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2021,29(4):615-619. DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2021.04.029.
[24] 温佃敏. 中等职业卫生学校护理专业学生的专业承诺现状及相关因素研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2023.
基金
南充市社科规划项目健康南充研究专项课题（NC24JK01）
PDF(1025 KB)
