目的 补充修订中文版探究社区量表并检验其在本科护生中的信效度。方法 基于Brislin翻译模式对探究社区量表“情感存在”维度进行汉化及跨文化调适,与已汉化的社区量表3个维度合并形成四维度探究社区量表。采用方便抽样法,于2023年10—12月对723名本科护生进行问卷调查,检验中文版四维度探究社区量表的信效度。结果 中文版四维度探究社区量表的条目水平内容效度指数为0.800~1.000,量表水平内容效度指数为0.909;探索性因子分析提取4个公因子,累计方差贡献率72.277%;二阶验证性因子模型分析结果显示,模型拟合良好。总量表平均提取方差值为0.634,组合信度为0.870;总量表Cronbach α系数为0.979,各维度Cronbach α系数为0.876~0.974;总量表重测信度为0.858,各维度重测信度为0.799~0.840。结论 四维度探究社区量表具有良好的信效度,可用于测量我国本科护生的混合式学习体验。
Abstract
Objective To revise the Chinese version of the Community of Inquiry Instrument and test its reliability and validity in nursing undergraduates. Methods The "emotional presence" dimension of the Community of Inquiry Instrument was translated and cross-culturally adapted based on the Brislin model, merging with the three already translated dimensions of the instrument to form a four-dimensional Community of Inquiry Instrument. Convenience sampling was used to select 723 nursing undergraduates from October 2023 to December 2023 to test the reliability and validity of the instrument. Results Item-level content validity of the scale ranged from 0.800 to 1.000, and the scale-level content validity was 0.909. Exploratory factor analysis extracted four common factors with a cumulative variance contribution of 72.277%. Second-order confirmatory factor analysis showed the model fit well. The average extracted variance of the total scale was 0.634, and the composite reliability 0.870. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the total scale was 0.979, and that of each dimension ranged from 0.876 to 0.974. The re-test reliability of the total scale was 0.858, and that of each dimension ranged from 0.799 to 0.840. Conclusion The revised Chinese version of Community of Inquiry Instrument has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to measure blended learning experience of nursing undergraduates in China.
关键词
探究社区量表 /
本科护生 /
信度 /
效度
Key words
Community of Inquiry Instrument /
nursing undergraduate /
reliability /
validity
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Graham, CR.Blended learning: global perspectives, local designs[M]. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing, 2006: 3-21.
[2] 李芳, 王婷婷, 王丽, 等. 基于BOPPPS教学模式的混合式教学在本科护理教学中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(22):4126-4128.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.22.029.
[3] 王向荣, 谭玲莉, 贺惠娟, 等. 基于课程思政理念的混合式教学在《护理人文修养与沟通》中的应用研究[J]. 军事护理, 2023,40(3):105-108;116.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.03.026.
[4] Dziuban C, Graham CR, Moskal PD, et al.Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies[J]. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 2018, 15(1): 3. DOI:10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5.
[5] Martin F, Wu T, Wan L, et al.A Meta-analysis of the community of inquiry presences and learning outcomes in online and blended learning environments[J].Online Learning, 2022, 26(1): 325-359. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v26i1.2604.
[6] Arbaugh JB, Cleveland-Innes Martha, Diaz S, et al.Developing a community of inquiry instrument: testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample[J]. Internet High Educ, 2008, 11:133-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003.
[7] Cleveland-Innes M, Campbell P. Emotional presence, learning,the online learning environment[J]. Int Rev Res Open Dis,2012,13(4):269-292.https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1234.
[8] Dell D.Emotional presence in community of inquiry: a scoping review and delphi study[D]. Athabasca: Athabasca University, 2021.
[9] Sundgren M, Jaldemark, J, Cleveland-Innes M. Disciplinary differences and emotional presence in communities of inquiry: teachers’ expressions of digital technology-enabled teaching[J]. Comput Educ, 2023,4:1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100134.
[10] Jiang M, Koo K.Emotional presence in building an online learning community among non-traditional graduate students[J]. Online Learning, 2020, 24(4): 93-111. DOI:10.24059/olj.v24i4.2307.
[11] 兰国帅, 钟秋菊, 吕彩杰, 等. 探究社区量表中文版的编制——基于探索性和验证性因素分析[J].开放教育研究, 2018, 24(3): 68-76. DOI:10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.
[12] 王晓娇, 夏海鸥. 基于Brislin经典回译模型的新型翻译模型的构建及应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016, 31(7):61-63. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.
[13] 单广良. 流行病学与应用多元统计分析[M]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2022: 156-172.
[14] 张颖, 郝燕萍, 罗岚. 安宁疗护护理质量量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 48-53. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.
[15] 王美珠, 邱克冉, 林蓓蕾, 等. 线上课程评价量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学杂志, 2024, 39(20): 83-86, 101. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.
[16] Schreiber JB.Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis[J]. Res Social Adm Pharm,2021,17(5):1004-1011.DOI.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.
[17] 简称苹, 张汉卿, 王丽英, 等. 本科护生自我调节学习策略量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 12-15. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.
[18] 付会斌, 潘海燕, 孔丹莉, 等. 二阶验证性因子模型的AMOS实现[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2013, 30(1): 52-56.
[19] 李梦俏, 关倩琳, 武雨晨, 等. 修订版智慧型幸福量表的汉化及信效度检测[J]. 军事护理, 2024, 41(4):15-17, 32. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.
[20] 朱亚晋, 王朝辉, 代明珠, 等. 临床护士文化能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 46-50. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.17.046.
[21] 杨翠翠, 王玉冰, 徐晶晶, 等. 青少年1型糖尿病病耻感评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27(18): 2253-2259. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.
[22] 李晓彤, 马明玥, 段欣星, 等. 妊娠相关焦虑量表(简化版)的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理研究, 2024, 38(23): 4196-4201. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.
基金
中华医学会医学教育分会和全国医学教育发展中心2023年度医学教育研究课题（2023B274）; 潍坊医学院2023年校级教育教学改革与研究课题（2023YBD013）
PDF(978 KB)
