麻醉护理风险管理培训课程的构建

姚呈, 高翔, 杨明莹, 何艳琳, 李明烨

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (14) : 33-37.

PDF(794 KB)
PDF(794 KB)
护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (14) : 33-37. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.14.033
护理教育

麻醉护理风险管理培训课程的构建

  • 姚呈a, 高翔a, 杨明莹b, 何艳琳a, 李明烨a
作者信息 +

Construction of risk management training course for anesthesia nursing

  • YAO Cheng a, GAO Xiang a, YANG Ming-ying b, HE Yan-lin a, LI Ming-yea
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 构建适合我国麻醉护理人员麻醉护理风险管理培训课程,为麻醉护理教育提供实践依据。方法 以ADDIE教学模型为理论基础,结合文献分析、质性访谈拟定培训课程初稿,通过德尔菲法对 26名专家进行2轮函询,根据咨询结果筛选、优化条目池,构建麻醉护理风险管理培训课程。结果 2轮专家函询问卷回收率为 73%、85%;专家权威系数为 0.895、0.909;肯德尔和谐系数为0.347~0.497(P<0.001)、0.371~0.372(P<0.001);变异系数为0~0.30、0~0.18。最终形成麻醉护理风险管理培训课程,由29个条目组成。结论 研究构建的麻醉护理风险管理培训课程较为可靠,且具有科学性,对麻醉护理风险培训具有参考意义。

Abstract

Objectives To construct a training course of anesthesia nursing risk management suitable for anesthesia nurses in China, and to provide practical reference for Chinese anesthesia nursing education. Methods Based on the theoretical basis of ADDIE teaching model, combined with literature review and qualitative interview, the first draft of the training course was developed. Two rounds of consultation were carried out among 26 experts through Delphi method. According to the consultation, the item pool was screened and optimized to construct the anesthesia nursing risk management training course. Results The recovery rate the two rounds of expert consultation was 73% and 85%, and the expert authority coefficient 0.895 and 0.909, respectively. Kendall concordance coefficient ranged from 0.347 to 0.497 (P<0.001) and from 0.371 to 0.372 (P<0.001), respectively. The coefficient of variation was 0~0.30, and 0~0.18. The final course consisted of 29 items. Conclusion The training course of anesthesia nursing risk management constructed in this study is reliable and scientific, and has significance for anesthesia nursing risk training

关键词

麻醉护理 / 风险管理 / 课程构建

Key words

anesthesia nursing / risk management / course construction

引用本文

导出引用
姚呈, 高翔, 杨明莹, 何艳琳, 李明烨. 麻醉护理风险管理培训课程的构建[J]. 护理学报. 2024, 31(14): 33-37 https://doi.org/10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.14.033
YAO Cheng, GAO Xiang, YANG Ming-ying, HE Yan-lin, LI Ming-ye. Construction of risk management training course for anesthesia nursing[J]. Journal of Nursing. 2024, 31(14): 33-37 https://doi.org/10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.14.033
中图分类号: R47   

参考文献

[1] 杨婷婷,康佳敏,邢雪燕,等.国内外麻醉护士在职教育培训课程的研究进展[J].护理学报,2023,30(23):40-43.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.23.040.
[2] 杨青,张瑜,江小芳,等.近10年国内外麻醉护理教育文献分析及建议[J].护理学报, 2018, 25(21):4.
[3] 谢岚,温济金.护理风险管理在手术后麻醉恢复室中的应用研究[J].中国社区医师,2021,37(10):145-146.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2021.10.070.
[4] 张昕炜,李亚敏,许敏.循证护理对麻醉恢复室患者风险事件的规避效果观察[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2020,27(5):98-100.DOI:10.19793/j.cnki.1006-6411.2020.15.040.
[5] 罗利珍. 失效模式和效应分析在麻醉复苏室护理风险管理中的应用[J].广西医学,2017,39(2):283-285.DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2017.02.41.
[6] Isabella E, Jossy VBT, Cephas M,et al.Challenges of anesthesia in low- and middle-income countries:a cross-sectional survey of access to safe obstetric anesthesia in East Afric[J]. Anesth Analg, 2017, 124(1):290.DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001690.
[7] Lu SC, Cheng YC, Chan PT.Using ADDIE model to develop a nursing information system training program for new graduate nurse[J].Stud Health Technol Inform, 2016,225:969-970.
[8] 陈肖庚. ADDIE 教学设计模型在成人教育培训中的应用[J].成人教育,2011(1):38-40.
[9] 黄宇光,李天佐.中国麻醉学指南与专家共识(2020版)[EB/OL].(2021-07-03)[2021-10-10].https://csahq.cma.org.cn/guide/detail_1622.html.ISBN:9787117336123.
[10] 吕楚风. 住院患者感知护士服务态度的质性研究[D].武汉:武汉轻工大学, 2017.
[11] 阮洪. 对中国麻醉护理发展趋势的思考[J].上海护理,2019,19(1):1-3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2019.01.002.
[12] 丁红. 麻醉恢复室责任护士病情交接“十知道”的创建与实施[J].护理学报,2014,21(6):1-3.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2014.06.006.
[13] 赵秀芳,康荣.我国麻醉护理学科建设现况及未来发展趋势[J].循证护理,2021,7(4):489-493.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.2095-8668.2021.04.010.
[14] 田小利. 护理风险管理在麻醉科应用的效果[J].中国卫生产业,2015,12(31):193-194.DOI:10.16659/j.cnki.1672-5654.2015.31.193.
[15] 马涛洪,郭志佳,刘保江.探索美国麻醉护理发展对我国麻醉护理教育的启示[J].护理研究,2010,24(30):2737-2739.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2010.30.005.
[16] 狄恒丹,陈璐,吕琳,等.基于ADDIE模型的系统化培训策略在护理科研能力提升中的应用[J]. 护士进修杂志,2021,36(19):1795-1798.
[17] Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR.Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel:application of bootstrap data expansion[J].BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2005, 5:37.DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-5-37.
[18] Scott ES, Murphy LS, Warshawsky NE.Nursing administration research priorities: findings from a Delphi study[J].Journal of Nursing Administration, 2016, 46(5):238-244.
[19] 朱凯怡,陶红.基于改良德尔菲法的北京社区居家老年综合健康评估指标体系构建研究[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(11):1341-1345. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.279.

PDF(794 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/