以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (17): 1-5.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.17.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

肿瘤患者PICC置入部位医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤影响因素的队列研究

王琴1, 陈金1, 魏力1,2   

  1. 1.天津医科大学总医院,天津 300052;
    2.天津医科大学总医院空港医院,天津 300308
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-06 发布日期:2020-07-13
  • 通讯作者: 魏 力（1966-）,女,天津人,本科学历,主任护师,护理部主任。 E-mail：weili066100@126.com
  • 作者简介:王 琴（1993-）,女,四川宣汉人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Cohort Study on Influence Factors of Medical Adhesive-related Skin Injury in PICC Insertion Site of Tumor Patients

WANG Qin1, CHEN Jin1, WEI Li1,2   

  1. 1. General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China;
    2. Airport Hospital of General Hospital,Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300308, China
  • Received:2019-04-06 Published:2020-07-13

PDF (PC)

194

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤（medical adhesive related skin injury,MARSI）在PICC肿瘤患者中的发生情况及影响因素,为降低医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤的发生提供护理依据。方法 采用前瞻性队列研究的方法,选取2018年4月1日—11月20日在天津市某三级甲等医院行PICC置管的396例肿瘤患者作为研究对象,调查医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤的发生率,并分析医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤类型、医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤发生部位及影响因素。结果 肿瘤患者医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤发生率为26.8%（106/396）;医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤类型以接触性皮炎 13.9%（55/396）以及机械性皮肤损伤中的张力性损伤/水疱6.3%（25/396）为主,其次为潮湿相关性皮肤损伤1.3%（5/396）,毛囊炎1.0%（4/396）。医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤多发生在贴膜下皮肤63.2%（67/106）。多因素Logistic回归分析发现PICC导管相关感染（P<0.001,OR=3.271,95%CI：1.697~6.306）、穿刺次数（P=0.018,OR=2.474,95%CI：1.171~5.226）、导管维护周期延迟（P=0.018,OR=2.537,95%CI：1.176~5.473）是肿瘤PICC患者发生医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤的危险因素。结论 肿瘤患者PICC置管部位医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤发生率较高,且好发于贴膜下皮肤;医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤类型以接触性皮炎和机械性皮肤损伤居多;而感染、穿刺次数、导管维护周期延迟是医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤发生的危险因素。

关键词: 肿瘤患者, PICC, 医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤, 队列研究

Abstract: Objective To investigate the occurrence and influence factors of medical adhesive-related skin injury (MARSI) at PICC insertion site in tumor patients, and to provide nursing reference for reducing the occurrence of MARSI. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted and 396 tumor patients with PICC were selected in a tertiary grade A hospital in Tianjin from April 1st to November 20th, 2018. The incidence of MARSI was investigated, and the type and location of MARSI, and its influencing factors were analyzed. Results The incidence of MARSI in tumor patients was 26.8%(106/396). The main type of skin injury was contact dermatitis, accounting for 13.9% (55/396) and tension injury or blister in mechanical skin injury, accounting for 6.3%(25/396), followed by wet-related skin injury (1.3%, 5/396) and folliculitis (1.0%, 4/396). MARSI occurred mostly in the skin under the film (63.2%, 67/106). Multivariate analysis showed PICC-related infections (P<0.001, OR=3.271, 95%CI:1.697~6.306), times of puncture (P=0.018, OR=2.474, 95%CI:1.171~5.226) and delay in maintenance period (P=0.018, OR=2.537, 95%CI:1.176~5.473) were risk factors for MARSI in tumor patients with PICC. Conclusion The incidence of MARSI in PICC catheter site is higher in tumor patients, and it frequently occurs in the skin under the film. Contact dermatitis and mechanical skin injury are main type of MARSI and PICC-related infection, times of puncture and the delay of catheter maintenance period are risk factors for MARSI.

Key words: tumorous patient, PICC, medical adhesive-related skin injury, cohort study

中图分类号: 

  • R473.73
[1] McNichol L, Lund C, Rosen T, et al.Medical Adhesives and Patient Safety:State of the Science.Consensus Statements for the Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Adhesive-related Skin Injuries[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2013, 40(4):365-380.DOI:10.1097/NOR.0b013e3182a39caf.
[2] Konya C, Sanada H, Sugama J, et al.Skin Injuries Caused by Medical Adhesive Tape in Older People and Associated Factors[J]. J Clinical Nurs, 2010,19(9-10):1236-1242. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03168.x
[3] Farris M K, Petty M, Hamilton J, et al.Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injury Prevalence Among Adult Acute Care Patients: A Single-center Observational Study[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs,2015,42(6):589-598. DOI:10.1097/ WON.0000000000000179.
[4] Zhao H, He Y, Huang H, et al.Prevalence of Medical Adhesive-related Skin Injury at Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Insertion Site in Oncology Patients[J]. J Vasc Access, 2018,19(1):23-27.DOI:10.5301/jva.5000805.
[5] 余琪,童瑾,孙杉杉,等.PICC癌症患者医用粘胶相关皮肤损伤原因分析及对策[J].护理学报,2018,25(8):69-70. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.08.069.
[6] Bertero L, Massa F, Metovic J, et al.Of the UICC Classification of Malignant Tumours: An Overview of the Changes in the Pathological TNM Classification Criteria—What Has Changed and Why?[J]. Virchows Archiv, 2018,472(4):519-531. DOI:10.1007/s00428-017-2276-y.
[7] 卞伶玲,杨金娜,赵益,等.双腔Power PICC置管部位医用粘胶剂相关性皮肤损伤的风险预防管理[J].护理学报,2019, 26(6):64-66.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.06.064.
[8] Zhao H, He Y, Wei Q, et al.Medical Adhesive-related Skin Injury Prevalence at the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Insertion Site: A Cross-sectional, Multiple-center Study[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2018, 45(1): 22-25. DOI:10.1097/WON.0000000000000394.
[9] 沈燕,朱海霞,彭开珍,等.明胶海绵在患儿置入PICC所致接触性皮炎中的应用[J].护理学报,2017,24(8):37-39. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.08.037.
[10] 褚万立,郝岱峰.美国国家压疮咨询委员会2016年压力性损伤的定义和分期解读[J].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2018, 13(1):64-68.DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2018.01.014.
[11] 白姗,杨巧芳,董方方.医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤现况调查[J].护理学杂志,2017,32(18):14-17. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.18.014.
[12] Gorski L A .The 2016 Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice[J]. Home Healthcare Now, 2017, 35(1):10-18. DOI: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000481.
[13] O’grady N P, Alexander M, Burns L A, et al.Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2011, 52(9):e162-e193. DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.003.
[1] 范伊濛, 刘巧艳, 曹松梅, 汪淑华, 仲宇, 王晶晶, 夏卓然, 李滕. 基于临床护理分类系统的PICC相关性血栓预防护理知识库的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 21-24.
[2] 梁欢, 王璐, 孙志霞. 肿瘤患者留置PICC决策后悔发展轨迹及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(17): 51-56.
[3] 王丽, 李金芬, 易环, 钟佳丽, 靳枫, 林奕霞, 刘玉珍, 黄凤霞. 卡培他滨导致II-III级手足综合征患者中药外敷护理的对照研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(11): 63-67.
[4] 范芳莲, 吕莹, 笪亚红. 新生儿医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤风险评估量表的预测效能研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(11): 68-72.
[5] 王柳月, 李君丽, 黄春兰, 刘芳印. 住院患者PICC置管后恐动症发生现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 23-27.
[6] 花芸, 王雯沁, 刘志梅, 冯国和, 杜沫晗. 癌症患者PICC置管支持性照护需求量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 23-28.
[7] 项晓婷, 张会, 苏畅, 胡桑, 张真, 许静, 仲蕾, 陆雅维. Caprini评分联合凝血指标构建PICC相关性血栓风险可视化模型[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(13): 6-12.
[8] 赵丹, 马晓丽, 马敏杰, 王小兰, 马国婧, 李翻翻, 王盼盼, 岳勤. 电磁感应导航装置系统在PICC导管尖端定位中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(12): 70-72.
[9] 许汇娟, 刘颖, 姚嘉丽, 姚晶晶, 陈敏, 邱甜甜, 徐丹. 3种量表预测急性髓系白血病患者有症状性PICC相关血栓形成风险效果的比较[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(11): 59-64.
[10] 张涌静, 申华平, 郭庆峰, 王娟. 置入PICC并带管出院癌症患者基于mHealth技术延续护理的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 68-72.
[11] 邢淑君, 于玲, 陈鹤方, 孙柳, 梁嘉贵, 臧爽, 刘均娥. 肿瘤患者在新辅助免疫治疗临床试验中的角色感知及体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 6-10.
[12] 梁红梅, 常健, 周兴梅, 陈兰. 超声专科护士岗位设立及工作实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(2): 17-19.
[13] 褚玲玲, 陈萍, 冯丹, 刘行, 冯永冬, 孙建国. 肿瘤相关静脉血栓栓塞症防治指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(16): 43-48.
[14] 邓瑛瑛, 裴华清, 任英, 殷春梅, 文梅, 张小玲. 预防神经外科重症患者PICC相关性静脉血栓的循证护理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 36-40.
[15] 张丽娟, 李金兰, 钟巧玲, 罗庆华, 张慧珍, 谢新华, 覃惠英. 癌症患者术后下肢淋巴水肿行综合消肿治疗联合泡沫颗粒绷带的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 62-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!