以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 17-21.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.01.017

• 护理管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于三维质量结构模式PICU护理敏感性质量指标体系的构建

王斌1a, 王琳2, 李萍1b, 王洪梅3, 吴莹玉3, 卢学萍3, 于天倩1a, 权琳2, 黄霞1c   

  1. 1.青岛大学附属医院 a.重症医学科;b.腹部超声科;c.护理部,山东 青岛 266000;
    2.青岛大学附属医院崂山院区 胃肠外科,山东 青岛 266000;
    3.青岛大学护理学院,山东 青岛 266000
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-05 出版日期:2019-01-10 发布日期:2020-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 黄 霞（1973-）,女,山东青岛人,硕士,副主任护师,护理部副主任,E-mail:minglunli@sina.com。
  • 作者简介:王 斌（1990-）,男,山东青岛人,硕士,护师。

Development of PICU Nursing Sensitivity Quality Index System Based on Three-Dimensional Quality Structure Model

WANG Bin1a, WANG Lin2, LI Ping1b, WANG Hong-mei3, WU Ying-yu3, LU Xue-ping3, YU Tian-qian1a, QUAN Lin2, HUANG Xia1c   

  1. 1a. Dept. of Critical Care Medicine; 1b. Dept. of Abdominal Ultrasound; 1c. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000,China;
    2. Dept. of Gastrointestional Surgery, Laoshan Branch, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000,China;
    3. School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
  • Received:2018-08-05 Online:2019-01-10 Published:2020-07-16

PDF (PC)

584

赞

摘要： 目的 构建PICU护理敏感性质量指标,为科室护理安全质量评价与监测提供参考。方法 通过Delphi法对27名专家完成3轮有效函询,获得专家一致性意见,确定PICU护理敏感性质量指标。结果 3轮函询问卷有效回收率为96.6%、96.4%、100%,权威系数为0.899、0.900、0.910,一、二、三级指标的协调系数分别为0.338、0.392,0.412,具有统计学意义（P<0.01）,最终构建的PICU护理敏感性质量指标包含3个一级指标、15个二级指标、69个三级指标,各级指标选择意见逐步趋同。结论 建立PICU护理敏感性质量指标,可用于科室护理安全质量评价。

关键词: PICU, 三维质量结构, 护理敏感性质量指标, Delphi法

Abstract: Objective To construct a PICU nursing sensitivity quality index, and provide reference for the evaluation and monitoring of nursing safety quality. Methods With Delphi method, 27 experts completed 3 rounds of effective correspondence to obtain expert consensus then the PICU nursing sensitivity quality index system was developed. Results The effective recovery rate of the 3 rounds of expert inquiry was 96.6%, 96.4% and 100% respectively; the authoritative coefficient was 0.899, 0.900 and 0.910 respectively and the coordination coefficient of the first-, second- and third-level indicators was 0.338, 0.392 and 0.412, respectively. All these indicated statistical significance (P<0.01). The final constructed PICU nursing sensitivity quality index included 3 first-level, 15 second-level, and 69 third-level indicators. The selection opinions of all levels of indicators gradually converged. Conclusion PICU nursing sensitivity quality indicators can be employed for the evaluation of nursing safety and quality.

Key words: PICU, three-dimensional quality structure, quality of care sensitivity, Delphi method

中图分类号: 

  • C931.2
[1] 刘晓红. PICU专科护理敏感指标的构建与应用[J]. 医学信息, 2017,30(24):166-167. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2017.24.087.
[2] 杨苏,黄丽华.PICU护理质量敏感性指标的研究进展[J]. 护理与康复,2015, 14(9):834-836.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9875.2015.09.010.
[3] 崔金锐,陈英.Donabedian结构-过程-结果模式在护理敏感性质量指标构建中的应用进展[J] 护理研究, 2015,29(3A):769-772. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10096493.2015.07.001.
[4] Donabedian A.Measuring the Effectiveness of Medical Interventions: New Expectations of Health Services Research[J]. Health Serv,1966,25(15):697-708.DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2012.07.049.
[5] Liu M, Zhang L, Liu Z, et al.Practice and Effects of Transitional Care Quality Management Program Based on Structure-process-outcome Model[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2015,36(2):175-187.
[6] Schofield R, Chircop A, Baker C, et al.Entry-to-practice Public Health Nursing Competencies: A Delphi Method and Knowledge Translation Strategy[J]. Nurs Educ Today, 2018,65(2):102-107.DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.001.
[7] Lake E.Development of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2002,25(3):176-188.DOI:10.1002/nur.10032.
[8] Chang A, Gardner G, Duffield C, et al.A Delphi Study to Validate an Advanced Practice Nursing Tool[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2014, 66(10):2320-2330. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05367.x.
[9] Sjw O, Au S, des Ordons A, et al. A Modified Delphi Process to Identify Clinical and Research Priorities in Patient and Family Centred Critical Care[J]. J Crit Care, 2017,42(3):243-252.DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.008.
[10] 匡玲,温贤秀,唐颖,等. 中美护理质量敏感性指标评价研究现状[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2016,13(2):183-185.
[11] 丁雪茹,李新琳,马健,等. 心脏中心监护室护理安全质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2016,23(17):26-30. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.17.026.
[12] 成守珍,汪牡丹,陈利芬,等. PICU护理安全质量评价指标体系的构建[J].中华护理杂志, 2014,49(3):270-274. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2014.03.003.
[13] 李智英,成守珍,吕林华. 护理质量敏感指标在优质护理评价及持续改进中的应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014,49(10):1168-1171.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2014.10.002.
[14] 李冬梅,钱火红,朱建英. 医院PICC护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中国护理管理, 2013,13(10):48-51. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2013.010.018.
[1] 牛青梅, 喻英, 张倩, 贾雅甜, 田宇. 基于“三维质量结构”模型构建下肢动脉硬化闭塞症患者随访管理评价指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2025, 32(2): 70-73.
[2] 陈杰, 赖静, 王城阅, 徐良英, 晏娟, 罗雪. 基于三维质量结构理论的ICU护理人文关怀质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 54-59.
[3] 蔡文文, 张星星, 叶敏珊, 罗艳霞, 阮伟清, 李加. 基于结构-过程-结果模型构建结肠镜检查患者护理敏感性质量指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 1-6.
[4] 王琪, 刘腊梅, 陈莉娜, 阙晓玲, 苏绍玉. 基于结构-过程-结果模型儿童支气管镜围术期专科护理质量敏感指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(8): 69-74.
[5] 武艳, 徐琴, 周春苗, 董娟, 胡思萍, 袁昌平. 婴幼儿经鼻气管插管护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(23): 25-28.
[6] 韩云玲, 李兰花. 基于三维质量结构理论的造血干细胞移植病房护理质量评价指标体系的初步构建[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(13): 26-29.
[7] 周春兰,吉雪,吴艳妮,区洁霞,胡光丽. 基于Delphi法护理硕士专业学位研究生临床教师核心能力研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(3): 21-23.
[8] 吴巧媚,张利娟,郑静霞. 基于Delphi法ICU患者误吸风险评估体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(2): 1-6.
[9] 谢亚男,马涛洪,韩晓娟,宋欣华. 明确麻醉科护士围麻醉期工作职责的研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(12): 1-5.
[10] 周碧云,李国宏. 基于Delphi法的护理硕士专业学位研究生理论课程设置研究[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(9): 1-3.
[11] 王惠珍,魏小雪. 国际适用型本科护理人才培养目标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2015, (7): 14-18.
[12] 朱婷婷. Delphi法对慢性支气管哮喘病自我行为管理量表条目的筛选和评价[J]. 护理学报, 2015, (5): 1-4.
[13] 李萌,李梅,陈清秀. PICU护士工作倦怠心理弹性现状及相关性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2015, (22): 53-55.
[14] 葛果,陈伟菊,余建,周佩如,许万萍. 基于Delphi法糖尿病前期自我管理量表的研制[J]. 护理学报, 2015, (21): 5-9.
[15] 陈思超,马小琴. 药物临床试验研究护士工作内容指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2015, (17): 10-14.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!