目的 汉化家庭韧性评估量表,并检验其在我国乳腺癌患者中的信效度。方法 基于Brislin翻译模型翻译原量表,进行跨文化调适与预调查,并选取某三级甲等医院的320例乳腺癌患者进行调查,评价量表的信效度。结果 中文版乳腺癌家庭韧性评估量表共28个条目,探索性因子分析提取5个公因子,累积方差贡献率为70.862%。量表的Cronbach α系数为0.961,重测信度为0.884。量表水平的内容效度为0.967,条目水平的内容效度为0.867~1.000,效标关联效度为0.605（P<0.01）。结论 中文版乳腺癌家庭韧性评估量表具有良好的信效度,可用于评估我国乳腺癌患者的家庭韧性。
关键词：
乳腺癌; 家庭韧性; 量表; 信度; 效度
Objective To translate the Family Resilience Assessment (FRA) into Chinese, and to validate its reliability and validity in Chinese breast cancer patients. Methods FRA was translated based on the Brislin translation model and cross-cultural adaptation and pre-investigation were performed successively. A sample size of 320 breast cancer patients were selected for investigation to evaluate the reliability and validity of the translated FRA (C-FRA). Results The C-FRA consisted of 28 items, and 5 factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, which contributed to 70.862% of the variance. The total Cronbach coefficient of the scale was 0.961, and the test-retest reliability 0.884. The content validity of the C-FRA was 0.967, while the content validity of the item level was 0.867~1.000, and its criterion validity 0.605 (P<0.01). Conclusion The C-FRA is proved to be a good instrument with acceptable reliability and validity, and it is qualified to assess family resilience among Chinese breast cancer patients.
[1] 戴艳. 中学生家庭复原力的结构及其与心理健康的关系研究[D]. 北京: 北京师范大学, 2008.
[2] Li Y, Zhao Y, Zhang J, et al.Psychometric Properties of the Shortened Chinese Version of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale[J]. J Child Fam Stud,2016, 25(9):2710-2717. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-016-0432-7.
[3] 刘洋,杨金秋,叶本兰,等. 中文版家庭坚韧性量表的信度和效度研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2014,14(11):770-772. DOI:1671-315X(2014)11-0770-03.
[4] 卜彤,刘惠军. 家庭复原力问卷的编制[J]. 心理技术与应用,2019,7(3):173-182.DOI:10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2019.03.006.
[5] 吴丹燕,李惠萍,杨娅娟,等. 癌症患者家庭韧性相关评估工具的研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2018,18(11):1566-1570.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.11.029.
[6] Duncan LC, Meszaros PS, Savla J.Measuring Walsh’s Family Resilience Framework: Reliability and Validity of the Family Resilience Assessment Among Women with a History of Breast Cancer[J]. Marriage Fam Rev, 2016,53(7):667-682.DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2016.1263588.
[7] Tian J, Hong JS.Validation of the Chinese Version of the Resilience Scale and Its Cutoff Score for Detecting Low Resilience in Chinese Cancer Patients[J].Support Care Cancer,2013,21(5):1497-1502.DOI:10.1007/s00520-012-1699-x.
[8] 刘惠军,卜彤. 家庭韧性对抑郁的影响:个体心理韧性的部分中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020,18(1):72-77. DOI: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2019.03.006.
[9] Li Y, Wang K, Yin Y, et al.Relationships between Family Resilience, Breast Cancer Survivors’ Individual Resilience, and Caregiver Burden: A Cross-sectional Study[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2018, 88(11):79-84.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.011.
[10] 陈娟娟,李惠萍,杨娅娟,等. 家庭韧性对癌症患者心理韧性的影响:领悟社会支持和生命意义感的链式中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2019,27(6):1205-1209. DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2019.06.026.
[11] Brislin R.Back-translation for Cross-Cultural Research[J]. J Cross Cult, 1970,1(3):185-216.
[12] Paltun B, Bolukbas N.Turkish Version of the Cancer Stigma Scale: Validity and Reliability Study[J]. Psychol Health Med,2021,26(1):37-48.DOI:10.1080/13548506.2020.1867319.
[13] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2017.
[14] 程雪,许翠萍,张敏,等. 基于计划行为理论的无痛分娩意向自评量表构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021,28(2):5-9. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.02.005.
[15] 胡雁. 护理研究[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012.
[16] 刘丽萍,周春兰,吴艳妮,等. 情绪抑制量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报,2020,27(8):6-10. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.006.
[17] 王俊红,张振香,杨巧芳,等. 心脏康复量表的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019,54(4):632-636. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.04.033.
[18] 沈莺,彭幼清,黄莹,等. 洗手护士非技术技能行为量表的汉化及信度效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2021,21(1):31-36.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.01.008.
